INTEGRATED QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW

Adult Learning Programs of Alaska

September 21 – September 23, 1999

Fairbanks, Alaska

 

SITE REVIEW TEAM:

Betty Taaffe, Community Member

Vickie Horodyski, Community Member

Dennis Manson, Peer Reviewer

Sherry Modrow, Facilitator

Connie Greco, DMHDD QA Staff Member

 

INTRODUCTION

The Site Review Team reviewed DMHDD funded Developmental Disabilities Supported Services provided by Adult Learning Programs of Alaska (ALPA) from September 21 to September 23, 1999, using the Integrated Quality Assurance Review process. 

 

This report is the summation of the impressions of a community team after interviewing consumers, staff members, community members and staff of other agencies. It also includes a limited administrative review.  It does not represent or reflect a comprehensive review of this agency.  The community team has collaborated on this report and the findings represent their consensus.  DMHDD Quality Assurance staff provided an informal review of consumer files during the site review.

 

ALPA is a nonprofit organization providing support for 45 adults who experience developmental disabilities, in addition to providing comprehensive educational development for adults, out-of-school youth and Head Start-eligible children. ALPA’s nine member board of community volunteers sets policy and supervises the executive director. The organization employs about 72 full- and part-time staff members, including seven full-time Supported Services employees and 19 part-time Supported Living/Educational Respite Providers.

 

ALPA’s Supported Services currently receive approximately $325,130 in funding from DMHDD, $161,947 as Medicaid waivers and a small amount of long-term follow-up funds from the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation.  Services include Supported Employment, Supported Living, Case Management or Care Coordination, and Educational Respite.  The Fairbanks North Star Borough forms the service area.  ALPA has responded to requests to provide supports for more consumers, and the program has experienced growth over the past two years, primarily in the supported living area.

 

The site review team met for three days at ALPA’s office in Fairbanks.  The team consisted of two community members, a peer reviewer, a member of the DMHDD Quality Assurance staff, and a facilitator. Team members conducted interviews with 11 consumers and four family members, one board member, and six ALPA employees: four direct service providers, the program manager who also provides direct service, and the agency’s executive director.  The team also interviewed three individuals who work at related agencies: Alaska Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, Crossroads and ACCESS Alaska.  Interviews lasted between 20 minutes and one hour and were conducted by telephone or in person at people’s homes or at ALPA.

 

ALPA planned and advertised an Open Forum on September 21 at the Noel Wien Library. A notice ran in the local events section of the newspaper. Postcards were mailed to the agency’s consumers, and 45 businesses and related service agencies received faxed fliers describing the event.  One person attended, and comments made at the Open Forum have been incorporated into the body of this report.  The primary issue discussed during the forum was the difficulties faced by consumers or family members who are new to the DMHDD system and who have complicated cases involving a variety of service agencies, and how instrumental ALPA has been in helping families negotiate the maze of service coordination.

 

 

FINDINGS

Progress Since Previous Review:

 

1.       Previous Recommendation: The Board should explore ways to include consumer representation.

            Action Taken: The Board promotes consumer representation agency-wide and when                   recruiting for Board members actively seeks representation of people with disabilities.             Although there was a Head Start parent of a child with multiple special needs on the Board                  in FY99, there is currently no consumer representation on the Board.  This continues to               need action.

 

2.       Previous Recommendation: Assure the written appeals process revision is completed.

            Action Taken: This has been completed.

 

3.       Previous Recommendation: The facility does not provide equal access to all individuals.

            Action Taken: ALPA’s offices and classrooms moved into the Tanana Chiefs Conference             building in 1998.  The building meets all standards for accessibility.

 

4.       Previous Recommendation: Assure that all employees undergo timely background checks.

            Action Taken: This has been implemented.

 

5.       Previous Recommendation: Explore ways to increase consumers’ involvement in hiring and evaluating staff.

            Action Taken: This recommendation has been met.  A consumer sits on the interview                  panel for new full-time hires in the Supported Services program.

 

6.       Previous Recommendation: Create an evaluation system that assesses the employee performance and provides staff regular feedback.

            Action Taken: In place since June 1998: All staff evaluations are completed at least                     annually.

 

7.       Previous Recommendation: Find ways to connect people with non-paid community members.

            Action Taken: The agency includes training on encouraging and facilitating the                             development of natural supports in its staff development.  Transportation continues to be a                       serious barrier for consumers to attend as many activities as they would like, and a                       community task force has met to address transportation issues and needs.  While the                  agency has implemented the recommendation, staff find the limits of funding for   transporting people to be a continuing concern beyond their control.

 

8.       Previous Recommendation: Increase efforts to expose people to a wide variety of typical community activities.

            Action Taken: The agency has made significant efforts in this area.  A calendar of events             is provided for consumers, who are encouraged to take advantage of the wealth of          opportunities provided by other programs within ALPA.  Staff coordinate special events on         a regular basis.

 

9.       Previous Recommendation: Assure that consumers participate in the planning process.

            Action Taken: Recommendation implemented.  Staff survey consumers and their families            on an annual basis, and the information is incorporated into ALPA’s program goals.

 

10.   Previous Recommendation: Staff should gather the appropriate information from all key parties prior to creating or revising the planning document.

            Action Taken: Recommendation implemented.  An assessment process assists staff to   determine the appropriate parties to be involved in service planning for consumers.

 

11.   Previous Recommendation: Assure that plans contain clear, measurable goals and strategies.

            Action Taken: Recommendation implemented.

 

12.   Previous Recommendation: Work with employers to assure they become the primary problem solver.

            Action Taken: The recommendation has been met.  Staff work in consultant roles rather    than serving as the primary problem solver for workplace situations.

 

 

Model Practice

ALPA staff worked for an extended period of time to help a consumer realize the long-standing dreams of owning a home and having a pet.  The staff arranged the necessary supports, legal, financial and logistical, to bring about this remarkable accomplishment.  In the process, the staff reported that this consumer became the first person in the state to successfully access the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation’s HOPS program, which establishes gap financing for people with disabilities.  ALPA staff coordinated or helped arrange for the additional involvement of individuals and agencies in the community to help the consumer move into, maintain and improve the home.  This individual has realized a sense of accomplishment and well-being through this process, and now has the companionship of a pet as well:

“They want to help people to make their life better.” Consumer 

 

Individual home ownership is not practical or necessary for everyone. However, the team felt the willingness of ALPA staff to believe in people’s dreams and access the resources and supports necessary to help bring dreams to reality demonstrates a model of support that should be widely emulated.

 

 

General Program Characteristics

 

·          ALPA staff work hard to provide the services people need when they need them.

 

·          The consumer is the center of an organization with great attention to detail, in which employees feel empowered to problem-solve by using creative, innovative methods.

 

·          ALPA works “outside the box” to provide supports individuals desire.

 

·          ALPA has responded to consumer requests for services both by growing and by providing innovative services.

 

 

Choice and Self Determination

The team identified the following strengths under Choice and Self-Determination for people receiving DD services from ALPA:

 

+ Staff help consumers establish independence and exercise choices.

            “He wants to be on his own.”  Staff member

            “ALPA has always been consumer driven.” Family member

            “______ ran her own planning meeting, with 10 people there.  Our whole point is helping people explore what they want to do and then finding ways to make that happen.” Staff member

 

+ ALPA puts combinations of services together to enhance the independence of individuals.

            “This is every parent’s dream to have services in place like this; you raise your child to become independent.” Family member

            A family chose a shared care arrangement that they reported as being very beneficial.

 

+ Consumers indicate that staff are very responsive to their desires and choices; services focus on the desires of individuals.

 

+ Staff work to establish good relationships with consumers and family members, while not getting enmeshed in interpersonal or family issues.

            “Val is great.” Consumer

 

+ People have jobs where they feel they contribute and have meaningful relationships.

 

The site review results did not indicate material weaknesses in the area of Choice and Self- Determination.

 

 

Dignity, Respect and Rights

The team identified the following strengths under Dignity, Respect and Rights for people receiving DD services from ALPA:

 

+ Program staff model a strengths-based approach to interacting with individuals, with a focus on the positive.

 

+ Consumers report they feel that staff act more like friends than paid providers.

            “They treat you good.” Consumer

 

+ Family members reported letting go of worries and responsibilities because of the agency’s supports.

            “It has normalized life for me.” Parent

 

+ Consumers feel they have options without being pushed to accept particular ones.

 

+ Staff consider consumers’ dreams to be realized possibilities.

 

The site review results did not indicate material weaknesses in the area of Dignity, Respect and Rights.

 

 

Health, Safety and Security

The team identified the following strengths under Health, Safety and Security for people receiving DD services from ALPA:

 

+ People have choices of providers and feel comfortable having them in their homes.

            “Capable and trustworthy staff.” Consumer

 

+ Very high trust levels exist between consumers and providers.

            “I have never been dissatisfied with any worker.” Family member

 

+ Staff help people make health appointments and help them get there.

 

+ The agency encourage staff to use flexibility in meeting the needs of individuals; they take on activities that go beyond typical definitions.

 

The site review results did not indicate material weaknesses in the area of Health, Safety and Security.

 

 

Relationships

 

The team identified the following strengths under Relationships for people receiving DD services from ALPA:

+ Staff model how to develop good relationships with people by establishing strong relationships with individuals they serve and with providers of related services.

            “It took a lot of work and planning to make this happen; five people now cover most of my parental activities.” Parent

            “Excellent relationship and getting better as we all learn and grow.”  Related service provider

            A consumer reported wanting to stay in touch with his provider because “it’s not just a job to them,” even though the individual needs little day-to-day assistance.

 

+ Staff are very loyal to consumers in helping them to research positive outcomes, sometimes continuing to stay in touch after people move on from ALPA.

 

+ Consumers have opportunities to develop relationships with people in a wide variety of locations and activities.

            “It really helped when my provider got me involved in Special Olympics, ice skating and bowling.” Consumer

 

+ There is a good balance between providing services and giving consumers space to grow.

            “I can choose a friend or relative or whoever I want for respite.” Consumer

 

The site review results did not indicate material weaknesses in the area of Relationships.

 

 

Community Participation

The team identified the following strengths under Community Participation for people receiving DD services from ALPA:

 

+ ALPA assists people with taking part in activities outside their homes, and there is a wide variety of participation supported by the agency.

            Providers have recently provided supports to help people vote, learn to swim, go to line dancing classes, volunteer at Head Start, work out at a gym, attend free movie night at UAF, participate in Special Olympics and related dances, and “hang out” at Denny’s and other social scenes.

 

The site review results did not indicate material weaknesses in services provided by ALPA in the area of Community Participation.

 


Consumer Satisfaction Chart

Note: This chart applies only to consumer satisfaction with quality of life and supports that ALPA services can impact. Funding issues impact conditions that affect some responses.

DD

  Choice   N=15

  Dig&Res. N=15

  Hth,Saf,Sec N=15

  Relatns. N=15

  Com.Par. N=15

Outcome

Yes

No

 

Yes

No

 

Yes

No

 

Yes

No

 

Yes

No

Partial

Person/Parent/

guardian

15

0

 

15

0

 

15

0

 

15

0

 

11

0

4

Staff Performance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Person/Parent/guardian

15

0

 

15

  0

 

15

0

 

15

0

 

14

1

 

 

 

Staff Interviews

Growth and change in the program have meant an intense time for the staff; they feel the addition of new positions is already having an impact on lowering caseloads and, in one employee’s words, “making it better.”  Because of their attention to detail and high priority on meeting the needs of individuals, staff members feel they are still somewhat understaffed.

 

Paperwork, files and training manuals contain excellent detail and are maintained in an organized manner.

 

Staff have positive attitudes towards the agency, their jobs and the people they serve.  They report excellent relationships among members of the Supported Services team, and appear to have uniformly high opinions of the program manager, an opinion expressed by many consumers as well.  Staff have opportunities for professional and personal development and participate in varied educational pursuits.  Cross-training will add depth to both administrative and direct service capacities, and this effort is currently underway. This will provide a means of preventing problems when particular employees are unavailable for issues related to a particular consumer’s needs, as well as providing program staff with a global understanding of services to consumers. Members of

ALPA’s staff feel the organization trusts them to make good decisions and empowers them to be creative in working with consumers.

 

Several people mentioned the potential for increasing space needs if the program continues to grow.

 

 

Collateral Agency Interviews

The three related service agency staff interviews characterized ALPA services as being flexible, innovative and focused on positive outcomes for consumers.  ALPA staff are willing to work with individuals who are hard to serve or who have complicated histories.  The communication and supervision required between agencies under these circumstances highlight the willingness of ALPA staff to go the extra distance to provide individuals with choices.

 

Administrative/Personnel Management

ALPA is well-run and fully meets nearly all of the DMHDD administrative and personnel standards.  Administrative procedures seem to be well integrated into the everyday activities of the staff.  The training manual used to orient new members of the Supported Services staff is an outstanding tool.

 

The ALPA Board does not include representation or membership of people who experience developmental disabilities.  The agency is recruiting for two board seats and hopes to have a consumer or family member on the Board this year.

 

ALPA’s personnel policies do not specifically speak to conflicts of interest, but several key features are addressed under such headings as political activity and nepotism.

 

 

Program Management

ALPA’s space provides barrier-free access in a building that houses several other human services agencies.  Staff report increased cooperation with those organizations.  Supported Services had several changes in program management, but has a strong, highly regarded manager now.

 

ALPA staff report positive relations with the DMHDD regional program specialist, with high levels of support for consumers.

 

Waivers add flexibility in some areas but remove it in others.  Particularly as regards care coordination, ALPA has no way to receive compensation for the many hours the staff put into some of the extremely complex cases with which they work.  The State needs to address this issue to prevent agencies from having to limit their efforts on behalf of consumers.

 

 

Quality Assurance File Review

 

Files were arranged in an organized manner and contained relevant information.  All files reviewed contained the required documentation.  All staff members, consumers and guardians participating in the development of the plan should sign the plan, documenting their participation.  Some case notes were brief and could have been more developed.  Overall, the files were very well documented and well organized.

 

Areas Requiring Response

 

1.       The ALPA Board does not include representation or membership of people who experience developmental disabilities.  The agency is recruiting for two board seats and hopes to have a consumer or family member on the Board this year (Admin. Standard 6).  Restructuring of the governing board to allow for consumer and family member participation and sustained effort in recruitment could offer solutions.

 

2.       ALPA’s personnel policies do not specifically speak to conflicts of interest, but several key features are addressed under such headings as political activity and nepotism (Admin. Standard 10).  Minor revision to the policies to address conflicts of interest would satisfy the standard.

 

 

Other Recommendations

 

1.       Some people would like to have more options for their leisure time.  Lack of transportation

      options in the Fairbanks area severely limit access to community participation, and ALPA

      continues to support the efforts of the community task force as it seeks solutions to the lack of

      transportation.  ALPA staff provides people with many opportunities and should continue to

      explore ways to help people access groups such as service organizations, churches and clubs

      where they can expand their networks independently.

 

2.       While staff provides excellent opportunities for individuals to develop relationships with people from all backgrounds, some consumers express a desire to spend time with people who experience developmental disabilities.  Staff may consider supporting the development of linkages between consumers with similar interests and talents.

 

3.   The agency’s offering of cross training is an excellent opportunity for staff and will no doubt

      result in even better services.  This effort should be encouraged and supported.

 

4.  Collaborate with the Regional Program Specialist regarding compensation for care coordination.

 

 

Closing

The site review team would like to thank the staff, board and consumers who aided in the review.  It is a pleasure and an honor to participate in reviewing an agency where standards of service are excellent.  The commitment of staff to carrying out the wishes of people who use ALPA’s services was a central theme during interviews.

 

The final draft of this report will be prepared within 30 days and sent to DMHDD.  ALPA and DMHDD will collaborate on a plan to make needed changes.