Primary
Phase - Final Report
The Mental Health Performance Measures Pilot Project is a
joint effort of the Alaska Mental Health Board and the Division of Mental
Health and Development Disabilities (DMHDD) that began in February 2001. The goal of this project is to develop
standardized outcome measures to be used at all state-funded mental health
treatment facilities in Alaska. To
finalize these questionnaires, DMHDD contracted with the Alaska
Comprehensive and Specialized Evaluation Services (ACSES) to serve as
independent consultants to conduct a pilot project on draft
questionnaires. The pilot project has
been approached in two phases, a preliminary phase and a primary phase. The work of the Preliminary Phase, to
collect clinician and consumer feedback about the ease of use, structure, and
utility of the instruments, has been completed and results were submitted to
the Oversight Committee. The goal of the Primary Phase, to evaluate the
sensitivity of the revised versions of the instruments to consumer change
across time, has been achieved and results are presented in this report.
Reports
Prepared by ACSES and Submitted to the Oversight Committee:
Instrumentation
Three instruments were used in the Preliminary Phase,
namely, the Client Assessment Worksheet, Mental Health Consumer Satisfaction
Survey, and Mental Health Statistical Improvement Program Consumer Survey
(MHSIP). Based on feedback from
clinicians and consumers, the Oversight Committee made additional revisions to
these instruments after the Preliminary Phase. The resultant instruments are
the Client Status Review, Demographics Questionnaire, and the MHSIP.
Client Status Review
For the Primary Phase, the revised Client Assessment
Worksheet was renamed the Client Status Review. Appendix Seven provides the
original Client Assessment Worksheet; Appendix Eight provides the Client Status
Review used in the primary phase of this pilot project.
Demographic Questionnaire
For the Primary Phase, the revised Mental Health Consumer
Satisfaction Survey was renamed the Demographic Questionnaire. Two versions of the Demographic
Questionnaire were developed, an Adult Services version and a Child and Family
Services version. Appendix Nine
provides the original Mental Health Consumer Satisfaction Survey; Appendix Ten
provides the Adult Demographic Questionnaire; Appendix Eleven provides the
Youth Demographics Questionnaire.
Mental Health Statistical Improvement Program Consumer
Surveys
Three versions of this instrument were used, namely, Adult
Survey, Youth Services Survey, and Youth Services Survey for Families. Appendix Twelve provides the original Adult
MHSIP. The original youth surveys
consisted of 26 items; subsequent revisions (by the national group that is
developing and refining this instrument) have resulted in 21-item
questionnaires. Appendix Thirteen
provides the original Youth Services Survey; Appendix Fourteen provides the
Youth Services Survey for Families.
Global Assessment of Functioning
In addition to administering these questionnaires,
clinicians were asked to provide a current Global Assessment of Functioning
(GAF) for each client. GAFs were
collected to provide an established measure of client functioning against which
to compare the overall CSR results. It
should be noted that GAFs are not precise measures; however, clinicians are
trained in their use and they do provide some data for comparison purposes.
Procedures
Prior to data collection, an ACSES staff member visited each
of the participating agencies to provide training regarding timing and
procedures, including information on research design, data submission
procedures, and confidentiality issues.
Prior to administering the instruments, clinicians were to ask consumers
if they would be willing to help with the project by answering the questionnaires,
providing opinions about the questions, and making recommendations about
possible changes.
Time One Data Collection
At Time One, after receiving consumer consent, clinicians
administered the CSR in a structured interview format to as many consumers as
possible over a one-month time period (later extended to last six weeks), and
asked the same consumers to complete and return the Demographic Questionnaire
and MHSIP independently. The one-month
time period was selected to allow for missed appointments, to allow inclusion
of consumers who are on a once-a-month schedule, and similar
circumstances. To match Time One and
Time Two responses, questionnaires were coded with consumers’ ARORA or agency
identification number (no names were used anywhere on the research
protocols). Due to two agencies getting
started late, the data collection period was extended for an additional two
weeks to maximize data collection opportunities; all sites were notified of and
invited to participate in this change of timeframes. Actual Time One dates differed from administration site to
administration site and are provided in the individual agency descriptions
below.
Subsequent to completing the CSR with the consumer,
clinicians handed the consumer a packet containing the Demographic
Questionnaire and the MHSIP to complete independently and gave them a brief
overview of the tasks involved. A cover
letter from ACSES to the
consumer
was included in the packet to explain the purpose of the project and the
procedures used to insure confidentiality and anonymity. On behalf of ACSES, clinicians also provided
stamped, self-addressed envelopes to the consumers, who had the option either
to mail the questionnaires directly to ACSES or to seal the envelope and give
it to an agency staff member (e.g., a receptionist) who would mail it for
them. Consumers were also given the
option of asking clinicians to help them complete the questionnaires if they
needed assistance. Due to the low rate of return by mail from consumers during
the Preliminary Phase, clinicians were asked to encourage their consumers to
exercise their right to give feedback about the services they receive and, if
possible, to complete the questionnaires while at the agencies and return them
in sealed envelopes to a staff person to be mailed for them.
Time Two Data Collection
Time Two administrations were conducted four to six weeks
after Time One, following the same procedures outlined for Time One and using
the same questionnaires. During Time
Two, clinicians administered the questionnaires to the same consumers
who responded during Time One. Any
consumers who completed the questionnaires during Time One and were discharged
before Time Two began, were to be administered the questionnaires the second
time at their time of discharge.
Ideally, consumers were to complete the questionnaires during a
termination session. However, if the
consumers did not attend a termination session, the clinicians were asked to
mail all three instruments to the consumers to complete and return in a
pre-paid, self-addressed envelope to ACSES.
Time Two data collection began on July 16 and was completed for all
agencies on August 13, 2001.
Due to the low participation rate at
several of the sites, as reported in the Interim Report, the Oversight
Committee requested that more Time One data be collected. This was particularly important for
gathering rural consumer and clinician feedback, as well as additional input
from child and youth consumers.
Arrangements for additional Time One data collection were made; agencies
did not collect Time Two data for those consumers.
Based on community size, region, willingness to participate,
number of consumers serviced, and informed consent procedures in place, six
pilot sites were selected by DMHDD to participate in this pilot project. These agencies were as follows: Southcentral Counseling Center, 4Rivers
Counseling Service, Alternatives Community Mental Health Center, Bristol Bay
Mental Health Center, LifeQuest, and Norton Sound Behavioral Health Service. A brief description of their level of
participation during the Primary Phase follows.
Staff training for the Time Two administration
phase was conducted with the clinical associates on July 5. Time Two data was collected from July 16
through August 13. It is notable that throughout this pilot
project participation at this agency was higher than at any of the other
agencies. This may be attributable to
the Executive Director’s strategy to solicit volunteers, set a minimum level of
participation, and offer monetary and compensatory
incentives to each staff participant who achieved
the requisite participation level. SCC staff members are to be commended for their
efforts in this project.
4Rivers Counseling Service, McGrath
Staff training for Time One of the primary phase was
conducted on May 4 with the Executive Director. The primary clinician at this site continued to have strong
personal objections to the overall project and called in sick on the day of the
training. However, on the same day as
the training, an ACSES staff member observed this clinician to be in good
health on the flight from Anchorage to McGrath. The Director prepared detailed written instructions for the
clinician outlining the administration process and a directive that she was to
participate by administering the questionnaires to her consumers according to
the research design procedures.
The clinician called an ACSES staff person stating that,
because of to 4Rivers policies and procedures, the clients’ bill of rights, and
her ethical practice, she could not administer the surveys to clients aged
13-18 without written informed consent of the parents. She reported that this was consistent with
her need to obtain written informed consent from parents each time she traveled
to her assigned villages to provide mental health services. She expressed a great deal of concern that
asking her clients to complete the questionnaires was not part of their
treatment plans and, therefore, outside the realm of professional
practice. She also reported being
unable to administer the questionnaires to children and youth because she saw
these consumers in their school environment and therefore did not have contact
with the parent/primary caregiver to obtain informed consent. The ACSES staff person notified the
Executive Director of the clinician’s request for an informed consent form and
the need to coordinate this request with DMHDD (as other agencies had
successfully done). The informed
consent form developed for this project was provided to the Executive
Director. Anne Henry, DMHDD, also
talked with the clinician to impress upon her the importance of gathering information
from her client population. The
clinician stated that she was participating; however, she did not schedule
further trips to the villages during Time One administration and was on
vacation for the month of June.
The Director prepared a short introduction
letter from his agency to explain the project to consumers and to emphasize the
importance of rural input into the project.
Data collection was scheduled to begin on May 7 and to be completed on
June 15. Because the Director was out
of McGrath for most of the Time One administration period and the clinician did
not administer any questionnaires, no data was received from this site. The lack of data from Time One precluded the
agency’s participation during Time Two administration.
Alternatives CMHC, Anchorage
Staff training for Time One of the primary phase was
conducted on May 10 with clinicians and case managers, with much discussion
about the administration process. Staff
wanted to administer the questionnaires to their consumers aged 18-21 who were
involved with the Division of Juvenile Justice. For this group of consumers, the adult questionnaires were used,
with the clinicians noting the consumer’s age and custody status on the forms.
The Utilization Review Manager expressed the need for an
informed consent prior to administering the questionnaires. Although it was explained that the consent
form developed for the Preliminary Phase was sufficient, the manager remained
firm in the need for a different consent form.
This issue was referred to Executive Director to resolve with
DMHDD. A staff person noted that the
Division of Family and Youth Services (DFYS) has its own regulations about
consumers participating in this type of project. The Director decided that they would
contact
DFYS about giving them a general consent for their consumers to participate in
the project, which might eliminate the need for youths to complete the consent
forms. Developing and coordinating
another consent form with DMHDD and other projects with which the agency was
involved led to delay in data collection.
Data collection started the week of May 21 and was completed on June
15.
Time Two staff training was
conducted on July 10, and data were collected from July 16 through August
13. Staff also collected additional
Time One data during this phase from consumers who had not yet participated in
the project. During the Primary Phase,
the agency experienced significant staff turnover that negatively affected
staff’s ability to collect an adequate sample size of consumers. The Executive Director and the Utilization
Review Coordinator remained interested, cooperative, and enthusiastic about the
project, and did their best to collect data.
Bristol Bay Mental Health Center, Dillingham
Staff training for Time One of the primary phase was
conducted on May 1, with data collection for adult consumers starting on May 2
and scheduled to end May 30. The
Executive Director requested that staff administer the questionnaires to child
and youth clients as well. However, no
child or youth surveys were administered because the assigned clinician felt
the CSR was not age-appropriate. In
some of the villages, village-based family social workers were to be asked to
administer the questionnaires to their clients, instead of agency staff. A ‘village code’ number on the form would
identify this. Time One data collection
was conducted from May 8 through June 15.
Staff training for Time Two was held
on July 9 with data collection occurring from July 16 through August 13. Staff also collected additional Time One
data during this phase from consumers who had not yet participated in the
project.
LifeQuest, Wasilla
Staff training for Time One of the primary phase was
conducted on May 3 with case managers and the Medical Services Team; staff
training for outpatient clinicians was conducted on May 7. The Medical Services Team opted out of
administering the questionnaires due to the ‘non-billable’ nature of the
service and concerns that the data would not show improvement unless administered
at intake, since the majority of their consumers were already stabilized on
medications. Data collection by case
managers began on May 7; outpatient clinicians started data collection on May
8. Data collection was completed on
June 15.
Time Two staff training was
conducted on July 12 with case managers and outpatient clinicians, with data
collection scheduled to begin on July 16 and to be completed on August 13. When no data had been received from the agency
by August 27, an ACSES staff member contacted one of the managers coordinating
the project at LifeQuest. This
individual reported being unsure what had happened, stating that the departure
of the administrative person coordinating the project and staff’s busy
schedules were the most likely contributing factors to the lack of data. The manager reported that staff was ‘so
pushed’ with other demands that she had not asked them to do more. The Executive Director, however, stressed
the importance of gathering the Time Two data to the managers and the data
collection period was extended until September 14 to permit staff to
re-administer as many surveys as possible.
This deadline was extended again until September 21, when data had still
not been received. Due to the need to
establish a cut-off date that would permit adequate time to evaluate the data,
the deadline was
changed
to September 19, and an ACSES staff person traveled to Wasilla to pick up any
data that had been collected.
Norton Sound Behavioral Health Services (BHS), Nome
Staff training for Time One of the primary phase was
conducted on May 15. For the first week
during the administration period, no surveys were administered because most of
the staff was attending a local training conference. In some of the villages, staff planned to ask the village-based
counselors to administer the questionnaires.
Data was collected from May 21 through June 15.
Time Two staff training was
conducted on July 13, with data collection occurring from July 16 through
August 13. Staff also gathered
additional Time One data during this phase from consumers who had not yet
participated in the project. Despite
the Executive Director’s continued interest and enthusiasm about the project,
the agency’s participation rate continued to be lower than expected. This significantly limited the rural input
that was so important to the project.
Findings are presented in three sections: 1) staff
observations, which outline observations made by ACSES staff regarding the
level of cooperation and enthusiasm about the pilot project among participating
agency staff; 2) quantitative results, which provide data derived from the
questionnaires; and 3) qualitative results, which summarize written comments
made by consumers and clinicians about the questionnaires. Individualized reports regarding consumer
satisfaction at Time One were prepared for three agencies for which adequate
data were available. These reports were
distributed directly to these agencies and are not part of this report.
Clinicians’ responses to participating in the pilot project
were obtained from direct observation by an ACSES staff member during staff
training and from direct comments by clinicians. As in the Preliminary Phase, responses ranged from enthusiastic
acceptance of the project to significant resistance. Staff at most of the agencies were professional and
cooperative. However, at one agency,
some staff did not even look at the questionnaires during the training; at
another agency, one clinician avoided the training by calling in sick. All agency directors continued to be very
cooperative and interested in participating.
Specific levels of staff interest and cooperation at the various
agencies can be inferred from the response rates contained in Table One.
Several agencies
reported difficulties obtaining consumer participation for Time Two
administrations. Reasons cited included
not being able to contact consumers by phone, consumers being unwilling to meet
with the clinician, and consumers being on extended vacations or absences from
home during late summer months or relocating out of state. At two agencies, staff turnover and
workloads were reported as obstacles to completing the Time Two
administrations. Another concern had to
do with
language, with some staff members reporting that, for many of their clients,
English was a second language, creating a significant barrier to data
collection. Another concern expressed
by some staff members was that administering the instruments could have a
negative impact on therapeutic relationships.
These individuals suggested that an independent party, rather than
agency staff, should administer these types of
questionnaires.
Finally, several expressed concerns that the State would cut funding if
consumers did not show improvement over the two administrations.
Response and Match Rates
Table 1 provides the number of instruments completed at
Time One and Time Two, broken down by agency.
Across all agencies, 150 completed CSRs were submitted to ACSES for Time
One and 69 CSRs were submitted for Time Two.
In addition to the 150 CSRs returned at Time One, 21 CSRs were collected
out of phase with no plans for a Time Two administration; these 21 CSRs were included
in Time One analyses. Of the total 171 Time
One CSR protocols, 37.4% (n=64) were submitted by SCC, 33.9% (n=58) by
LifeQuest, 16.4% (n=28) by Bristol Bay, 7% (n=12) by Norton Sound, and 5.3%
(n=9) by Alternatives.
The length of time between Time One and Time Two
administrations ranged from 37 to 135 days, with a mean of 72.6 days
(SD=26.9). Based on ARORA numbers
provided on the CSR, it was possible to match 67 Time One (n=150) and Time Two
(n=69) CSRs, representing an overall match rate of 44.7% (67/150). Two of the Time Two CSRs included ARORA
numbers that did not match with any Time One ARORA numbers. It is unknown
whether this means that two consumers were administered Time Two protocols
without having received Time One protocols, or whether ARORA coding was
incorrect. The five participating
agencies varied in the overall match rate between Time One and Time Two as
follows: Southcentral Counseling Center, 75% (48/64); Bristol Bay, 23.5%
(4/17); Life Quest, 22.4% (13/58); Norton Sound, 20% (1/5); and Alternatives,
16.7% (1/6).
For Time One, 106 Demographic Questionnaires and 106 MHSIPs
were received from consumers. For Time Two, 54 Demographic Questionnaires and
54 MHSIPs were received. An additional
15 Demographic Questionnaires and MHSIPs were received for and used in
subsequent Time One analyses. These
additional protocols had no matching Time Two data. Of these received Time One forms, 112 were adult versions and 19
were youth versions; of the 54 Time Two forms, 53 were from adults and 1 from a
youth. On the consumer-completed
questionnaires, to insure confidentiality of responses, no means to match Time
One and Time Two information was requested.
However, by comparing responses to demographic items, it was possible to
match 42 Time One and Time Two Demographic Questionnaires and MHSIPs, for an
overall match rate of 39.6% (42/106).
Consumer Characteristics
Based on the place of administration of the 171 Time One
CSRs, it was possible to determine that 76.6% of the participants were from
urban areas and 23.4% were from rural areas.
Unfortunately, of the 67 matched CSRs, only 7.5% (n=5) were received
from rural areas. Table 2 provides Time
One and Time Two consumer and clinician responses for the adult version of the
Demographic Questionnaires. Based on
Time One data, 51 (45.5%) were female, 46 (41.1%) were male, and 15 (13.4%)
gave no response. The majority of adult
respondents were in the 23-59 years old category (83.9%, n=94). Of these consumers, 58 (51.8%) were
Caucasian, 40 (35.7%) Alaska Native/American Indian, five (4.5%) African
American, three (2.7%) Hispanic/Latino, two (1.8%) Asian/Pacific Islander, one
(0.9%) did not know, and three (2.7%) provided no response. Of the consumers, 67% indicated receiving
case management services, 76.8% psychiatric services and medications, 33.9%
transportation services, and 19.6% housing.
These figures suggest that the typical consumers who participated in
this pilot study were persons with persistent and severe mental illness.
Table 3 provides Time One and Time
Two consumer responses for 19 youth and child version Demographic
Questionnaires. Based on Time One data,
the majority of minor respondents were in the 6-12 years old category (63.2%,
n=12). Of the respondents, 13 (68.4%)
were Caucasian, three (15.8%) Alaska Native/American Indian, one (5.3%)
African-American, and two (10.5%) Other.
Client Status Review
On average, clinicians reported that
it took 10-30 minutes to administer the CSR, with the most commonly reported
timeframe being 10-15 minutes. A few
clinicians reported taking longer, depending on the client’s intellectual level
or diagnosis. One clinician noted that
‘scheduling time to meet with the clients was more of a problem’ than
administration time.
Of the 171 CSRs received during Time One administration, five
questionnaires were missing the consumer’s ARORA or agency number. Most of the missing ARORA (or agency)
numbers were later obtained by an ACSES staff member; however, this took
additional staff time. Almost
three-quarters of the Time One instruments (70.8%, n=121) were returned without
the Sum of Ratings section completed.
Of the 50 CSRs returned with the Sum of Ratings scored, eight (16.0%)
were scored incorrectly. Of the 69 CSRs
received during Time Two, all included an ARORA or agency number. Of these 69 Time Two CSRs, 18 (26.1%) did
not provide calculated Sum of Ratings.
Of the 41 returned with the Sum of Ratings scored, three (7.3%) were
scored incorrectly.
Initial review of the CSR data
revealed some missing responses, particularly on the five components of
Question #6. At Time One, 7.0% of
protocols had at least one of the 10 responses missing; at Time Two, 4.3% had
at least one item missing. Table Four
provides the specific number of missing responses for each CSR item. As the Sum of Ratings is calculated based on
responses to all 10 items, any missing data will yield a Sum of Rating that is
not indicative of the consumer’s actual level of functioning. An alternative would be to calculate a Sum
of Rating based on the average score to the responses provided; this would then
yield a score that is comparable to other Sum of Ratings received from the same
or other individuals. However, scoring
the questionnaire in this matter is more complicated and prone to error.
Table Five provides Time One and
Time Two responses for the 67 matched CSRs.
Table Six provides means and standard deviations for each CSR item and
the Sum of Ratings for Times One and Two.
As a way of reminder, on the CSR lower scores indicate higher level of
functioning. Thus, the desired change
is one of lower scores at Time Two as compared to Time One. Thus, a difference score (typically
calculated as Time Two minus Time One) that is negative indicates
improvement, whereas a difference score that is positive indicates worsening. Table Six provides these mean difference
scores and results of t-tests comparing scores at Time One and Two. For the 10 primary items, four had negative
(improved) difference scores means (with difference scores ranging from -.03
to- .25), five had positive (worsened) difference score means (with difference
scores ranging from .01 to .15), and one had equal means (i.e., a difference
score of 0) at Time Two as compared to Time One. The Sum of Ratings was negligibly higher (worse) at Time Two than
Time One. Results of the t-tests
revealed that the differences between Time One and Time Two failed to reach
statistical significance on all individual items and the Sum of Ratings.
To look at change from Time One to
Time Two for each item and the Sum of Ratings in yet another way, Table Seven
provides the number of consumers who, at Time One versus Time Two, had either
the same, a lower, or a higher score.
Table Seven also provides results of McNemar’s change tests (Siegal,
1956), used to determine whether changes in responses to these items increased
or decreased in a consistent manner across consumers from Time One to
Time
Two. For all of the individual items,
the highest number of respondents had no change on the individual items. For those individuals for whom change was
reported, on a majority of the items the change was in the direction of
improvement (i.e., a decrease in item score).
However, when considering the Sum of Ratings, the proportion of consumers
who had the same scores was very low; the proportions who had an increase or
decrease in functioning was nearly identical.
Results of McNemar’s tests revealed
significant decreases in scores (improvements of functioning) on four items,
namely, “How often can you currently get the physical health care that you
need?”, “Have friends/relatives asked you to cut down on alcohol or other drugs
or to quit entirely?”; “Have you experienced guilt because of your drinking or
use?”; and “Do you need an eye opener in the morning to get started?” Note that for the three drinking related
items, decreases (improvements) meant that the individuals stated “yes” at Time
One and “no” at Time Two.
In terms of overall functioning, at Time One, the Sum of
Ratings ranged from 8 to 34, with a mean of 19.4 (SD=4.3) and with lower scores
indicating better functioning. GAFs
obtained at Time One ranged from 21 to 95, with a mean of 48.6 (SD=12.0) and
with higher scores indicating better functioning. The correlation between the Time One Sum of Ratings and GAF
scores was -.37. At Time Two, the Sum
of Ratings ranged from 14 to 42, with a mean of 19.5 (SD=5.0). GAFs obtained at Time Two ranged from 21 to
80, with a mean of 42.3 (SD=10.8). The
correlation between Time Two Sum of Ratings and GAF scores was -.22. These levels of correlations suggest that
the GAF and Sum of Ratings measure different aspects of consumer functioning.
MHSIP
Table Eight provides Time One and Time Two responses to the
adult version of the MHSIP. Table Nine
provides means and standard deviations for each MHSIP item and the Domain
Subscales for Times One and Two. Table
Nine also provides the mean difference scores and results of t-tests
comparing Times One and Two. Of the
means for the 28 items, 20 were lower at Time Two than Time One (indicating
higher levels of satisfaction), seven were higher (indicating lower level of
satisfaction), and one was the same. Of
these differences, t-tests revealed statistical significance for only
one item, namely, “Encouraged to use consumer programs”, with greater
satisfaction being expressed with this item at Time Two. Of the four subscales, all were somewhat
lower at Time Two than Time One, indicating slightly higher levels of
satisfaction at Time Two; however, the differences were not statistically
significant.
Table Ten provides the number of
consumers who had the same, lower, or higher scores at Time Two as compares to
Time One for each item and the domain subscales. Table Ten also provides results of McNemar’s change tests
(Siegal, 1956), used to determine whether changes in responses to these items
increased or decreased in a consistent manner from Time One to Time Two. For most of the items, the highest number of
respondents had no change on the individual items. For those individuals for whom change was reported, on 22 of the
items, the change was in the direction of greater satisfaction (decrease in
score); on four of the items, change was in the direction of lesser
satisfaction, and on two items the number of consumers whose satisfaction
decreased and increased were the same.
Results of the McNemar’s tests revealed significant changes in scores on
only four items, all in the direction of greater satisfaction: “Staff were
willing to see me as often as I felt necessary”; “Encouraged to use consumer-run
programs”; “I do better in school and/or work”; and “My housing situation has
improved”. When considering the four
domain subscales, the majority of consumers reported
slightly
higher levels of satisfaction at Time Two than Time One, although these differences
did not reach statistical significance.
Table Eleven provides Time One
responses to the Youth Services Survey for Families. No Time Two data were provided on this instrument. Table Twelve provides Time One and Time Two
responses to the Youth Services Survey.
Given that only one Time Two questionnaire was collected, no further
analyses were conducted.
At the request of the
Oversight Committee, additional analyses were conducted to assess whether rural
and urban respondents differed from one another in their responses to the
instruments. Additionally, analyses
were requested regarding potential differences between consumers of Alaska
Native heritage as compared to those of other ethnic backgrounds. The rural versus urban comparisons were
based on location of data collection and hence were possible for all
instruments. Ethnicity was not assessed
on the CSR, making such analyses impossible for this instrument. As ethnicity information is collected on the
Demographic Questionnaires, it was possible to conduct analyses on ethnicity
for the MHSIP and Demographic Questionnaire.
Rural versus Urban
Analyses: Initial review of the
Demographic Questionnaire revealed that consumers from urban and rural agencies
differed significantly on a number of critical variables related to type of
clientele served. Specifically, urban
consumers represented in the current sample were more likely than their rural
counterparts to report that they are:
·
receiving psychiatric services/medications (91% urban; 56% rural);
·
receiving case management (86% urban; 25% rural)
·
receiving long-term care (2 years or more; 72% urban; 34% rural)
·
non-Native versus Alaska Native (79% urban; 39% rural)
These findings strongly suggest that the urban and rural
samples included in this project were not equivalent, but rather were comprised
of significantly different consumers.
Specifically, it appears likely that the urban sample was comprised of a
relatively homogeneous group of consumers who received intensive long-term care
and who were likely to represent a persistently and severely mentally ill
population. The rural sample appeared
to be comprised of a much more heterogeneous group of consumers. Further, rural versus urban location of
assessment was highly correlated with ethnic background, making it impossible
to tease out the different effects of these two ways of grouping the
sample.
Given the dissimilarity of the urban versus rural sample
and the confounding of location with ethnicity, additional analyses are not
appropriate (thus, although they were calculated, they are not reported here,
lest they be misunderstood as usable and appropriate). For example, if differences were revealed in
urban versus rural responses, it would be impossible to ascertain whether these
differences were caused by urban versus rural factors, ethnic backgrounds, or
type of consumer. To address questions
regarding location in the state and ethnicity, future data collection must
incorporate careful stratified sampling procedures.
A complete listing of the qualitative comments provided by
clinicians and consumers is provided in Appendices One to Six, categorized by
instrument and site. Following is a
summary of the most commonly expressed concerns, provided separately for each
questionnaire. This summary should not
be used in place of reading the comments.
It is evident that the clinicians and consumers put a lot of thought
into their comments and a careful review of the comments is crucial to the
credibility of any additional instrument revision or replacement effort. Not surprisingly, given that all clinicians
and many consumers had encountered the questionnaires previously, most consumer and
clinician responses to the follow-up questions about the questionnaires
themselves were brief, and significantly fewer responses were obtained than in
the Preliminary Phase.
Overall Comments
According to clinicians, consumers were willing to complete
the questionnaires in the structured interview format and most who were asked
to participate did so voluntarily. One
consumer who declined to participate did so because of ‘too much asking and too
much paperwork’ (as recorded by the clinician). One rural agency reported that three consumers declined to
participate. One clinician offered this
general comment about all of the questionnaires: ‘Many of the participants requested help with the forms, which
were created with the intention for independent completion from the consumers. Keeping this in mind, I think it is important
to plan the wording carefully to encompass the wide range of education barriers
that many people struggle with.’ A
number of clinicians noted that consumers needed clarification on many
questions. At one rural agency,
clinicians noted that about one-half of their consumers needed help completing
the Demographic Questionnaire and MHSIP.
They also noted that most consumers did not want to complete the forms
while at the agency, preferring to take and mail them later. Also of note were concerns expressed by
consumers about inadequate staffing, overworked staff, and Medicaid funding
cuts that have decreased services and make filling out additional forms a
significant hardship.
Client Status Review:
Overall Comments
Appendix One provides clinician and consumer comments in
response to the CSR. Several consumers
expressed positive opinions about the process:
‘I enjoy the questions. I
support this questionnaire. Good
job.’ However, a number of consumers
also expressed negative comments about the CSR, such as ‘I didn’t like
intrusive questions; I don’t think these questions are necessary; don’t like
nosey people.’ One consumer
commented that ‘the questions assuming substance abuse and problems with the
law are offensive.’
A significant number of
clinicians and consumers commented that the CSR was not appropriate for
children and youth, and recommended developing a separate questionnaire that is
more applicable to a younger consumer population. Comments in
this regard included ‘doesn’t apply to consumer’s age’, ‘none applied’, ‘not
worded for parents to answer for a child’, and ‘should make a form for the
parent specifically to answer for the child.’
Several clinicians noted having to reword questions, using consumers’
names, since they were requesting the information from the consumers’
parents. The overall recommendation
from consumers and clinicians alike was to develop a separate questionnaire for
child and youth consumers structured in such a manner as to be completed by a
parent or primary caregiver.
One rural provider commented,
representatively so, in conversation that rural services differ significantly
from urban services in that they tend to be much more short-term (one or two
sessions), crisis-focused, or intensive in nature. Systemic interventions at the family and community level are more
common and will not be captured by the current CSR. This provider suggested alternative means for assessing the
success of rural mental health programs, not focusing on individual clients,
but focusing on community perceptions and use of the local mental health
agency.
The majority of consumers reported
that the CSR questions were neither hard to answer (64.2%), nor unclear
(68.9%). One consumer suggested adding
the question, ‘What do you
feel has
been helping the most?’ Another
suggested asking, ‘Is treatment confidential (private)?’, while noting the lack
of privacy in a case manager’s office.
Another consumer indicated a ‘Need to ask if [services are] adequate
after hospitalization.’ Clinician
comments included adding questions about client satisfaction and complaints
about medications and services, treatment results over time, and lack of
improvement and its reasons. One
clinician indicated that the questionnaire should have asked more about mental
health. Another clinician asked, ‘What
are you attempting to determine?’
Specific CSR Item Comments
Following is a summary of comments made regarding specific
CSR items. The reader again is urged to
read the detailed comments in the Appendix and not to rely only upon the
summaries.
Comments about CSR Question One: On Question 1 (regarding activity), one consumer commented ‘If
you weren’t doing one of those things, you’d be dead.’ Along the same line, one clinician noted
that the response ‘not active’ makes it appear ‘as if the consumer never does
any activity’, suggesting ‘It may be
better to state a choice such as rarely active, minimally active, etc.’ Another
asked ‘level of activity, how defined for a home-schooled child?’ Another consumer described the question as
‘nebulous.’ There were several
clinician comments that adding agency group activities should be part of
meaningful activity since this was ‘an active area’ for many consumers.
Comments about CSR Question Two: Several consumers commented that Question 2
(regarding physical health problems) was difficult to answer or unclear due to
the wording and being ‘unsure about physical.’
One consumer attributed weight problems that negatively affected her
mental health as the factor that kept her from doing normal activities.
Comments about CSR Question
Three: For Question 3 (regarding
physical health care access), a number of consumers noted services that they
needed, such as eye and/or dental care.
One consumer wrote ‘I need dental care and just filled out a grant
through the dental program.’
Comments about CSR Question Four: Numerous comments about Question 4
(regarding payment for health care) indicated that consumers had difficulty
choosing between ‘fully insured’ or ‘well-insured’ because Medicaid and
Medicare were not identified and do not cover all services. Other consumer comments included ‘confusing;
Medicaid & Medicare needed to be specified.’ One consumer asked ‘Is health care the same as mental health
care?’
Comments about CSR Question Five: There were several comments about including
crisis respite services on Question 5 (regarding hospitalization for mental
health care) since consumers had used this type of service with the past six
months.
Comments about CSR Question Six: Question 6 (regarding drug and alcohol use)
received the most criticism, with a recurrent theme from both clinicians and
consumers being that the question presumed a substance use problem. One consumer captured the predominant
feeling about this question: ‘I don’t
drink and you should have asked if I did before you implied that I needed to
answer these questions.’ Other consumer
comments included: ‘I felt it was intrusive; assumes I have drug/alcohol
problem; where to indicate no longer using? You assume I’m alcoholic; I have 3
years clean and sober and nowhere to note it; Don’t drink!’ Clinician comments
echoed those of consumers: ‘#6
continues to be a poorly worded question as many of those who participated do
not use drugs or alcohol and felt this question assumed that they did;
Consumers find it difficult to differentiate whether the question is pertaining
to past or present use; Need to ask whether client drinks/drugs.’ There also seemed to be some confusion on
the part of consumers about how to answer the questions. One clinician commented that a consumer had
answered ‘yes’ to the question about feeling guilty because of one relapse with
alcohol use.
Another
consumer answered ‘yes’ to ‘are you annoyed by friends or relatives who question
your use?’ and wrote in ‘annoyed by other people pressuring (me) to use.’ There were also a number of comments
wondering if caffeine and tobacco were considered drugs. One clinician noted
that response option one had ‘weird phrasing – double negative.’
Comments about CSR Question
Seven: On Question 7 (regarding
financial situation), one parent indicated that the child has Medicaid, but the
parent herself or himself faces ‘extreme financial hardship.’ One clinician reported that a consumer had
problems with this question, stating ‘Kids questioned if this relates to their
finances or their parents’?’
Comments about CSR Question
Eight: On Question 8 (regarding
housing), several consumers wrote in ‘pay rent’ as a clarification to ‘live
with others.’ One consumer was unsure
about being independent or not, commenting ‘I’m very dependent on various
agencies.’ One clinician stated that
the question ‘continues to not address transitional housing’ and asked ‘Does this
fit into the homeless category?’ A clinician
commented that ‘the parents own; the kids live with their parents. Question
doesn’t make sense.’
Comments about CSR Question Nine: For Question 9 (regarding general safety),
consumers’ comments indicated that mental health issues, rather than environmental
factors, primarily determined their feelings of safety. One parent added an explanation to response
option three to indicate that the child is fearful of being teased or picked
on. Several consumers noted feeling
fearful or paranoid as a result of their symptoms or their own actions,
acknowledging that there were no identifiable external threats. Several clinicians noted that consumers felt
safe and were aware of suffering from paranoia. Only one consumer referred to environmental factors, stating
‘It’s hard to feel safe when hearing about community violence that may not
directly affect me.’
Comments about CSR Question Ten: One clinician had several
comments for Question 10 (regarding involvement with police, court, jail) about
the redundancy of ‘legal issues pending’ and ‘felony charges pending’, and the
need to clarify terms, such as ‘extreme impact’ and ‘non-lock-up
facility.’ Another clinician commented
that ‘non-criminal involvement’ was unclear terminology. One clinician added the comment ‘unknown, if
any’ regarding the consumer’s legal involvement.
Demographic
Questionnaire (Adult, Child and Families)
Of the consumers who completed a Demographic Questionnaire
and MHSIP, 95.5% returned them directly to ACSES via mail. The vast majority of consumers (60.1%)
reported that they understood the questions and that they were clear
(61.5%). Only two consumers stated that
the questionnaire was too long.
Appendix Two provides comments on the adult version of the
Demographics Questionnaire; Appendix Three provides comments on the youth
version. Many consumers took the opportunity to express appreciation for staff
and services they receive, as well as to identify some problem areas. Comments from a number of consumers
suggested the need to ask open-ended questions regarding how they felt about
the quality of the services.
Suggestions were as follows:
·
Do
you need more help?
·
Are
you happy with your counselor or doctor?
·
Are
you happy with the programs?
·
How
are the meds working?
·
If
you don’t like your counselor, what are your options?
·
Can
you choose providers?
·
·
Does
the system adequately help you completely control your mental illness?
One consumer wondered if “… this [is] a test of our
competence?’ Another consumer stated
‘the purpose isn’t clear…’ A few consumers noted that the questionnaire did not
ask everything that they thought was important about mental health services and
that questions should be added, although they did not elaborate.
Two respondents completed one
questionnaire each for two children receiving services (completed by biological
parent and adoptive parent for one child; completed by a biological parent and
a foster parent for the other child).
On the question asking about guardian, conservator, or payee, several
consumers wrote in the name of the person, instead of selecting the job title
of the person.
Several consumers selected or wrote
in more than one response for the question about ethnicity. When this occurred, the minority ethnicity
was recorded in the data tables. One
clinician recommended using the new United States Census Bureau categories for
the ethnic group.
For the question regarding services,
one clinician noted that ‘housing, transportation, employment and advocacy
services are not applicable’ in rural location. Several clinicians noted that consumers did not know what
‘advocacy’ meant. Some consumers were
unclear that group therapy or group counseling were included in the
‘therapy/counseling’ choice, as indicated by their addition of the name of
specific treatment groups in the ‘Other’ category. A couple of consumers selected ‘Other’ and wrote in comments,
such as ‘new client’ or ‘just started’.
The question concerning frequency of
services received the largest number of write-in consumer responses, suggesting
the need to more clearly define the answer options. One consumer selected two responses: ‘daily’ and wrote
‘occasionally’ in the ‘Other’ category.
Consumers wrote a variety of responses in the ‘Other’ category (e.g.,
‘for years’, ‘varies’, ‘3-5 days/week’, ‘3x a week’, ‘4x a week’, ‘rarely’, ‘5
days/week’). One consumer selected
three responses, commenting that ‘some services are monthly, others may be
weekly – to lump them together makes it more difficult to answer.’
MHSIP (Adult)
Over three-fourths of the consumers found the questions
understandable and clear (77.4%) and inclusive of issues that they thought were
important to ask about mental health services (61.9%). Appendix Four provides the comments provided
by consumers in response to the adult version of the MHSIP. A few consumers responded that the
questionnaire did not ask everything that is important about mental health
services, but did not elaborate on what was missing. Of note were consumer comments regarding the need to ask about
other agency staff and about billing techniques. Only three respondents felt that the questionnaire was too
long. One consumer asked ‘Will I get
the outcome of this survey?’ and wondered ‘if this survey helps in
funding.’ Another consumer suggested
adding a question about ‘What programs or areas of your life would you like
more help in…?’ Another consumer
commented ‘This questionnaire is a good tool if your ears and hearts are
open and compassionate.’ A clinician
reported continuing to have to provide assistance in understanding the
questions and clarifying the wording to simplify questions to many of the
consumers. The clinician reported that
‘many of the participants requested assistance with the Demographic and MHSIP
survey questionnaires which were intended for independent completion from the
consumers. Keeping this in mind, I
think it is important to plan the wording carefully to encompass the wide range
of education barriers that many people struggle with so that, in the event this
form is completed independently, it will be easy to follow and answer.’ One clinician reported that many of the
consumers read the word
‘options’
in Question 2 as ‘opinion’ and needed assistance with the question. The
suggestion was to change the wording of the question to ‘choice’ or
‘preference.’ Several consumers noted
that Question 17 was difficult to understand and unclear, with one consumer
commenting that ‘both therapist and I decided treatment goals’ and another
‘difficult to know if you want the end results or the actual
therapy/participation.’ Question 19 was
also identified as problematic for several consumers, but no elaboration was
provided.
MHSIP (Youth and Families)
The majority of respondents (70.6%) thought the
questionnaires were understandable, clear, and inclusive of issues that were
important to ask about mental health services.
None reported that the questionnaires were too long. Appendix Five provides consumers’ comments
in response to the Youth Services Survey for Families; Appendix Six provides
consumers comments in response to the Youth Services Survey. However, few comments were provided by
consumers. One consumer suggested
adding the question ‘what kind of services do you feel were lacking?’ One consumer noted the ‘high turnover in
manpower’ and having been ‘treated disparately’ at an agency. One youth consumer selected N/A for 18 of
the 26 responses. Another youth
consumer selected two responses for the question asking if staff were sensitive
to cultural/ethnic background, writing in the comment ‘1 person’ for Agree and
‘all others’ for Disagree.
Two sets of recommendations will be offered. The first set focuses on recommendations for revising the instruments; the second set focuses on recommendations for the next phase of pilot testing.
Assuming that DMHDD and the AMHB wish to revise the CSR,
Demographic Questionnaires, and the MHSIPs to incorporate Primary Phase
feedback from consumers and clinicians, a number of recommendations follow for
such revisions. These recommendations were developed based upon consumers’ and
clinicians’ feedback.
Client Status Review
·
Develop
a separate questionnaire that is age-appropriate for child/youth consumers
·
Question
1: Answer 5: change to ‘Rarely active’
·
Question
2: Answer 1: change to ‘Rarely’
Answer 5: change to
‘Almost always’
·
Question
3: Reword parenthetical description to
read “Does not include dental and eye care, and is defined as care received
from your regular, local, or visiting health care provider”
·
Question
4: Specify in the question whether health care refers to mental or physical
health, or both
Answer 1: change ‘ Fully
insured’ to ‘free’
Answer 2: change ‘Well-insured’
to ‘Good insurance’; add ‘, such as Medicaid/Medicare/insurance co-pay’
to end of parenthetical sentence
·
Questions
6: Given considerable missing data on
this item, and clinician and consumer criticisms, consider a major rewrite of
this item. One possibility is to
rewrite question to be a more general query of substance use/abuse that
highlights the need for further evaluation, rather than using a standardized
assessment tool designed to access degree of SA
·
Question
8:
Answer 1: delete ‘or
I chose to live with others’
Answer 2: delete
‘family or others’
Answer 4: change
‘temporary’ to ‘transitional’ and add ‘temporarily’ to ‘staying with
family/friends’
·
Question
10:
Answer 3: change
‘legal issues now pending’ to ‘misdemeanor changes pending or conviction’
Answer 4: after
‘pending’, add ‘or conviction’; delete ‘or extreme impact’; change ‘contested
divorce, contested custody issues’ to ‘contested divorce and/or custody issues’
Answer 5: change
‘non-lock-up facility’ to ‘half-way house’; add ‘Title 12’ before ‘mandatory’
·
For
all versions, incorporate the questions at the end of the MHSIP
·
Question
2a: Change ‘If yes,’ to check boxes for
guardian, payee, conservator
·
Question
3:
Change stem to read:
‘Which one of …’
Use new US census ethnic categories
·
Question
5, answer 1 – add ‘(includes individual & group)’
·
Question
8, answer 1 – after ‘Daily’, add ‘(5-7 days/week)’
Demographic Questionnaire (Child
& Family Services)
·
Completed
by: change ‘biological parent’ to
‘biological/adoptive parent’
·
Question
2: change stem to read ‘Which one of …’
·
Question
6: after stem, add ‘(Please select only
one.)’
·
Question
7, answer 1 – add ‘(includes individual & group)’
·
Question
10, answer 1 – after ‘Daily’, add ‘(5-7 days/week)’
Adult MHSIP
·
Place
demographic questions at end of MHSIP questions, similar to that of Youth &
Family MHSIPs
·
Include
open-ended questions in the Adult version:
What has been the most helpful thing about the services you
have received over the last 6 months?
What would improve services here?
Youth MHSIP
·
Use
the revised 21-item versions of the Youth Services Survey and Youth Services
Survey for Families
Recommendations for the Next
Phase of Pilot Work
For any future investigations into the utility and
psychometric characteristics of these instruments, we make the following
recommendations:
1)
The
Oversight Committee may be interested in gathering feedback from staff members
at mental health agencies around the state via focus group and key informant
interview formats to identify problem areas and possible solutions that could
help further refine the performance measures instruments for youth and rural
consumers. It appears that rural
providers perceive the instruments as less applicable to their clientele than urban
providers, which has likely contributed to the resistance by rural providers to
participating in this pilot project and may also lead to resistance to using
the measures in future. The suggestion
of rural providers to develop alternate means of measuring outcomes in rural
areas in this regard appears particularly pertinent.
2)
Using
the same focus group and key informant interview formats suggested in item 1),
it would be helpful to gather feedback from child and youth mental health care
providers before beginning construction of a child/youth version of the
CSR. Merely adapting the current CSR
downward in age may not fully meet the needs and concerns of these providers,
as completely different topics may need to be assessed to measure outcomes
among a younger consumer population.
3)
To
gain further insight into the current questionnaires and any newly developed
questionnaires (such as a child or rural version), administration of
instruments should be repeated at a different set of agencies (or at different
programs within agencies that participated this time). This re-testing phase is particularly
important for determining the utility of new versions (youth, rural) in rural
areas, with ethnically diverse populations, and with youth and adolescent
populations. Stratified sampling (by
primary diagnosis, ethnicity, gender, and rural/urban residence) may be
necessary to receive definitive answers about the instruments’ utility across
geographic locations, ethnic backgrounds, and types of clientele. Such stratified sampling would require
extreme cooperation by agencies and may be difficult to realize.
4)
This
phase ideally would allow sufficient time to include a trial of reporting
collected data back to clinical staff to let them see what types of summary
reports can be expected based on the data collection. Such feedback would serve two purposes. First, it would demonstrate to clinicians that useful data comes
back to the agency and that data do not just disappear into a “black
hole.” Second, such reporting back
would allow for double-checking whether the data are indeed useful in meeting
their purpose of improving services.
Clinicians could look over the data report to ascertain if the data
would, in fact, help them improve the services they are currently providing to
their consumers.
For future investigations into the statewide
implementation of outcome measures, we make the following recommendations:
6) It appears necessary to collect more input from direct service provider about possible barriers, resistances, and solutions to the actual process of gathering and reporting outcome data (independent of what instruments are being used). It appears that rural versus urban staff members had different concerns and that different procedures (and perhaps even instruments) are needed to accommodate rural versus urban settings. To gather this input, agency staff and consumers could meet in (separate) focus groups to answer specific questions about the process of gathering and using outcome data. These focus groups could be combined with the focus groups mentioned in item 1) above.
7) Given concerns and the lack of clarity expressed by clinicians and consumers about the purpose of these instruments, it may help to use the terminology of “outcome” rather than “performance” measures.
AGENCY (# of packets provided) |
TIME ONE |
TIME TWO |
||||||||||||
Client
Status Review |
Demographic Questionnaire |
MHSIP |
Client Status Review |
Demographic Questionnaire |
MHSIP |
|||||||||
Adult |
Youth |
Family |
Adult |
Youth |
Family |
Adult |
Youth |
Family |
Adult |
Youth |
Family |
|||
Bristol Bay (105) 75 Adult 15 each Youth & Family |
17 (11)1,2 |
11 (7)1,2 |
-- |
-- |
11 (7)1,2 |
-- |
-- |
5 |
3 |
-- |
-- |
3 |
-- |
-- |
LifeQuest (575) 225 Adult 175 each Youth & Family |
58 |
23 |
0 |
15 |
23 |
6 |
9 |
14 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
Alternatives (225) 25 Adult (18-21 only) 100 each Youth & Family |
6 (3)1,2 |
0 (1)1,2 |
0 |
3 |
0 (1)1,2 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Norton Sound (100) Adult |
5 (7)1,2 |
7 (6)1,2 |
0 (1)1,2 |
0 |
7 (6)1,2 |
0 (1)1,2 |
|
1 |
0 |
-- |
-- |
0 |
-- |
-- |
SCC (84) Adult |
64 |
57 |
|
-- |
57 |
-- |
-- |
48 |
47 |
-- |
-- |
47 |
-- |
-- |
TOTALS |
150 (21) 171 |
112 |
1 |
18 |
112 |
7 |
12 |
69 |
53 |
1 |
0 |
53 |
1 |
0 |
121 |
121 |
54 |
54 |
Notes: 1)
Additional Time One administration only
2) Data
not included in Time Two
TABLE TWO
Demographic
Questionnaire (Adult)
1. How old are you? |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 18 |
18-22 |
23-59 |
60 or older |
No response |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time
1 |
Time
2 |
Time 1 |
Time
2 |
Time
1 |
Time
2 |
Time
1 |
Time
2 |
Time
1 |
Time
2 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 |
0 |
8 7.1% |
3 5.7% |
94 83.9 |
49 92.5% |
10 8.9 |
1 1.9% |
0 |
0 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. Do you
have a guardian, conservator or payee? |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes
|
No
|
No Response
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30 26.8% |
22 41.5% |
82
73.2% |
30 56.6% |
0 |
1 1.9% |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indicate which one. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Guardian
|
Conservator
|
Payee
|
Other
|
N/A or Don’t know |
No Response
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3
2.7% |
0 |
4
3.6% |
3 5.7% |
14
12.5% |
14 26.4% |
4 3.6% |
1 1.9% |
3 2.7% |
30 (N/A) 56.6% |
2
1.8% |
5 9.4% |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.
Which of the following best describes the race or ethnic group that
you consider yourself?
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
African American |
Asian/Pacific
Islander |
Hispanic/ Latino |
Alaska Native/ American Indian |
Caucasian |
Don’t know |
No Response |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 4.5% |
4 7.5% |
2 1.8% |
2 3.8% |
3 2.7% |
0 |
40 35.7% |
11 20.8% |
58 51.8% |
35 66% |
1 0.9% |
0 |
3 2.7% |
1 1.9% |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.
Gender |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Female |
Male |
No Response |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
51 45.5% |
20 37.7% |
46 41.1% |
29 54.7% |
15 13.4% |
4 7.5% |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5.
Which of the following services have you received in the last year
from <agency>? |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Therapy/
Counseling
|
Housing
|
Family Services |
Transportation Services |
Psych Svcs/Meds
|
Case Management |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
70 62.5% |
43 81.1% |
22 19.6% |
5 9.4% |
5 4.5% |
4 7.5% |
38 33.9% |
19 35.8% |
86 76.8% |
47 88.7% |
75 67.0% |
47 88.7% |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Employment |
SA
Tx |
Advocacy |
Other |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 2.7% |
7 13.2% |
13 11.6% |
8 15.1% |
14 12.5% |
10 18.9% |
12 10.7% |
4 7.5% |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.
Are you still receiving services from <agency>? |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes |
No |
No Response |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
101 90.2% |
50 94.3% |
6 5.4% |
1 1.9% |
5 4.5% |
2 3.8% |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7.
How long have you been receiving, or did you receive, services from
<agency>? |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 6 mos. |
6 mos. – 2 years |
2-5 years |
More than 5 years |
No Response |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22 19.6% |
2 3.8% |
21 18.8% |
11 20.8% |
24 21.4% |
13 24.5% |
43 38.4% |
26 49.1% |
2 1.8% |
1 1.9% |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Note: Gray boxes provide Time One data; white
boxes provide Time Two data |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8. About how often do (or did) you receive services from <agency>? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Daily |
Once/week |
Twice/week |
Once/month |
Twice a month |
Every other month |
Every 3 months |
Other |
No Response |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21 18.8% |
12 22.6% |
27 24.1% |
13 24.5% |
20 17.9% |
15 28.3% |
10 8.9% |
2 3.8% |
13 11.6% |
5 9.4% |
1 0.9% |
0 |
2 1.8% |
0 |
13 11.6% |
5 9.4% |
5 4.5% |
1 1.9% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9.
Comments. Is there anything
else that you would like to tell us about yourself or the services that you
receive that might help us to better serve you? (See Appendix Two) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No |
Written Comments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
98 57.3% |
37 69.8% |
73 42.7% |
16 30.2% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Note: Gray boxes provide Time One data; white boxes provide
Time Two data |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TABLE THREE
Demographic
Questionnaire (Child & Family Services)
Completed by: |
|||||||||
Biological Parent |
Self |
Foster Parent |
Guardian |
Other |
|||||
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
7 36.8% |
0 |
5 26.3% |
1 100% |
2 10.5% |
0 |
2 10.5% |
0 |
3 15.8% |
0 |
1. How old are you (or the child receiving services)? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6-12 |
13-17 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 63.2% |
0 |
7 36.8% |
1 100% |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. Which of the following best describes the
race/ethnicity that you consider yourself (or the child receiving services) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
African
American |
Asian/Pacific Islander |
Hispanic/ Latino |
Alaska Native/ Amer. Indian |
Caucasian
|
Other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 5.3% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 15.8% |
0 |
13 68.4% |
1 100% |
2 10.5% |
0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.
Gender |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Female |
Male |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 15.8% |
0 |
16 84.2% |
1 100% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4. What is
your school situation (or that of the child receiving services)? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In School
|
Not
in school
|
Working on GED |
Other |
Grade |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1-6 |
7-8 |
9-12 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 100% |
1 100% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 57.9% |
0 |
3 15.8% |
0 |
5 26.3% |
1 100% |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5.
Are you (or the child receiving services) in protective custody? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes |
No |
No Response |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 15.8% |
0 |
15 78.9% |
1 100% |
1 5.3% |
0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If yes, please select one of
the following and indicate for how long. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DFYS |
DJJ |
Parent-Guardian |
Other |
N/A or No Response |
Length of time |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 mos. |
No Response |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 10.5% |
0 |
1 5.3% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 84.2% |
0 |
2 10.5% |
0 |
2 10.5% |
0
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6. Who
referred you (or the child receiving services) to <agency> for mental
health services? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self-referred
|
Parent/Guardian |
DFYS |
DJJ |
School |
Other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 15.8% |
0 |
4 21.1% |
1 100% |
5 26.3% |
0 |
2 10.5% |
0 |
2 10.5% |
0 |
3 15.8% |
0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Note: Gray boxes provide Time One data; white boxes
provide Time Two data |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7. Which of the following services have you
(or the child receiving services) received in the last year from
<agency>? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Therapy/ Counseling |
Housing |
Family Services |
Transportation Services |
Psych Svcs/Meds |
Case Management |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 78.9% |
1 100% |
0 |
0 |
6 31.6% |
0 |
8 42.1% |
0 |
5 26.3% |
0 |
14 73.7% |
1 100% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Employment |
SA Tx |
Advocacy Service |
TX Foster Care |
Other |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 15.8% |
0 |
1 5.3% |
1 100% |
4 21.2% |
0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8.
Are you (or the child receiving services) still receiving services
from <agency>? |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes |
No |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 100% |
1 100% |
0 |
0 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9. How long have you (or the child receiving
services) been receiving, or did you receive, services from <agency>? |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 6 mos. |
6 mos. – 2 years |
2-5 years |
More than 5
years
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 15.8% |
0 |
11 57.9% |
0 |
3 15.8% |
1 100% |
2 10.5% |
0 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10. About how often do (or did) you (or the child receiving services) receive services from <agency>? |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Daily |
Once/week |
Twice a week |
Once a month |
Twice a month |
Every
other month |
Every 3 months |
Other |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 |
1 100% |
6 31.6% |
0 |
9 47.4% |
0 |
1 5.3% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 15.8% |
0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11. Comments. Is there
anything else that you would like to tell us about yourself (or the child
receiving services), or the services that you receive that might help us to
better serve you? (See Appendix Three) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No |
Written Comments |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13 68.4% |
1 100% |
6 31.6% |
0 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Note: Gray boxes provide Time One data; white boxes provide Time Two
data
TABLE FOUR
Item Number |
Time 1 N=171 |
Time 2 N=69 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
6a |
11 |
5 |
6b |
13 |
5 |
6c |
13 |
6 |
6d |
15 |
5 |
6e |
13 |
3 |
7 |
2 |
1 |
8 |
1 |
1 |
9 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
1 |
1 |
TABLE FIVE
(Based
on 171 protocols obtained at Time One and 69 protocols at Time Two)
1. How often
are you currently involved in activities that are important to you? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Usually everyday |
2-5 days/week |
5-10 days/month |
1-4 days/month |
Not Active |
No Response |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
49 28.8% |
20 29% |
64 37.6% |
19 27.5% |
17 10% |
7 10.1% |
22 12.9% |
13 18.8% |
18 10.6% |
9 13% |
1 0.6% |
1 1.4% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. How
often do physical health problems currently keep you from doing your normal
activities? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Never |
Occasionally |
Often |
Regularly |
Always |
No Response |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
55 32.2% |
18 26.1% |
56 32.7% |
24 34.8% |
25 14.6% |
10 14.5% |
23 13.5% |
12 17.4% |
12 7% |
4 5.8% |
0 |
1 1.4% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.
How often can you currently get the physical health care that
you need? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All of the time |
Most of time |
Sometimes |
Limited |
Almost Never |
No Response |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
85 49.7% |
34 49.3% |
45 26.3% |
21 30.4% |
20 11.7% |
10 14.5% |
14 8.2% |
2 2.9% |
6 3.5% |
1 1.4% |
1 0.6% |
1 1.4% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.
How is your health care paid for? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fully insured |
Well-insured |
Some ins. |
Very little ins. |
No insurance |
No Response |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
90 52.9% |
26 38.2% |
61 35.9% |
39 57.4% |
6 3.5% |
0 |
3 1.8% |
1 1.5% |
10 5.9% |
2 2.9% |
1 0.6% |
1 1.4% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5.
During the last 6 months, how many times
have you been hospitalized for mental health treatment? (Indicate length of
stay for each hospitalization, if available.) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
None |
1 time |
2 times |
3 times |
4 + times |
No Response |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
145 84.8% |
55 80.9% |
20 11.7% |
10 14.7% |
4 2.3% |
0 |
0 |
2 2.9% |
2 1.2% |
1 1.5% |
0 |
1 1.4% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6a. Have friends or relatives asked you to Cut
down on alcohol, tobacco or other drugs, or to quit entirely? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes |
No |
No Response |
N/A (added by
consumer) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
40 25.2% |
14 20.6% |
119 74.8% |
51 75% |
11 6.4% |
4 5.8% |
1 0.6% |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6b. Are
you Annoyed by friends or relatives who question your use? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes |
No |
No Response |
N/A (added by
consumer) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
27 17.2% |
10 14.7% |
130 82.8% |
53 77.9% |
13 7.6% |
6 8.3% |
1 0.6% |
0 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6c. Have
you experienced Guilt because of your drinking or use? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes |
No |
No Response |
N/A (added by
consumers) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31 20.1% |
11 16.2% |
123 79.9% |
52 76.5% |
16 19.4% |
6 8.7% |
1 0.6% |
0 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Note: Gray boxes provide Time One data; white boxes
provide Time Two data
6d. Do you need
an Eye opener in the morning (alcohol or other drugs) to get started? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes |
No |
No Response |
N/A (added by
consumers) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
9 5.9% |
1 1.5% |
143 94.1% |
62 91.2% |
18 10.5% |
6 8.7% |
1 0.6% |
0 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Number of ‘Yes’ answers
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Never used/ none |
Yes to one |
Yes to two |
Yes to three |
Yes to four |
No Response |
N/A |
||||||||||||||||||||
110 69.2% |
50 73.5% |
21 13.2% |
5 7.4% |
13 8.2% |
8 11.8% |
9 5.7% |
3 4.4% |
6 3.8% |
1 1.5% |
11 6.4% |
1 1.5% |
1 0.6% |
0 |
|||||||||||||
7.
Which of the following best describes your
current financial situation? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Very
secure financially |
Financially secure most of the time |
Somewhat financially secure |
Many financial
problems |
Extreme financial hardship |
No Response |
|||||||||||||||||||||
36 21.3% |
8 11.8% |
37 21.9% |
21 30.9% |
42 24.9% |
28 41.2% |
38 22.5% |
10 14.7% |
16 9.5% |
1 1.4% |
2 1.2% |
1 1.4% |
|||||||||||||||
8.
Which of the following categories best describes your current housing
situation? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Independent |
Live with others
|
Residential/
Sheltered care |
Homeless |
Institutional |
No Response |
|||||||||||||||||||||
115 68% |
50 73.5% |
37 21.9% |
10 14.7% |
12 7.1% |
3 4.4% |
5 3% |
5 7.4% |
0 |
0 |
2 1.2 % |
1 1.4% |
|||||||||||||||
9.
How would you best describe your current feeling of general safety? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Safe all the time |
Safe most of the
time |
Safe sometimes; unsafe other times |
Unsafe most of the time |
Unsafe all the time |
No Response |
|||||||||||||||||||||
50 29.6% |
14 20.6% |
74 43.8% |
32 47.1% |
37 21.9% |
19 27.9% |
0 |
0 |
8 4.7% |
3 4.4% |
2 1.2% |
1 1.4% |
|||||||||||||||
10.
Which of the following best describes your current involvement with
police, court or jail? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
None |
Limited |
Moderate |
Significant |
Extreme |
No Response |
|||||||||||||||||||||
119 70.4% |
54 79.4% |
18 10.7% |
6 8.8% |
19 11.2% |
1 1.5% |
12 7.1% |
7 10.3% |
1 0.6% |
0 |
2 1.2% |
1 1.4% |
|||||||||||||||
Note: Gray boxes provide Time
One data; white boxes provide Time Two data
TABLE SIX
Mean and Standard Deviation
Changes - Client Status Review
(Based on 67 pairs matched by
ARORA number)
Question
|
Time One
|
Time Two
|
Difference |
||||
Mean |
SD
|
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
t |
|
1.
How often are you currently
involved in activities that are important to you? |
2.46 |
1.25 |
2.61 |
1.42 |
0.15 |
1.28 |
0.95 |
2.
How often do physical health problems keep you from doing normal
activities? |
2.43 |
1.21 |
2.43 |
1.22 |
0 |
0.90 |
0 |
3. How often can you currently get the
physical health care that you need? |
2.01 |
1.05 |
1.76 |
0.92 |
-0.25 |
1.22 |
-1.70 |
4. How is your health care paid for? |
1.69 |
0.82 |
1.75 |
0.80 |
0.06 |
0.55 |
0.89 |
5. During last 6 months, how many times have
you been hospitalized for mental health Tx? |
1.25 |
0.66 |
1.30 |
0.76 |
0.04 |
0.59 |
0.62 |
6a. Have friends/relatives asked you to cut
down on alcohol/other drugs, to quit entirely? |
0.30 |
0.46 |
0.22 |
0.42 |
-0.11 |
0.36 |
-2.42 |
6b. Are you annoyed by friends/relatives who
question your use? |
0.21 |
0.41 |
0.16 |
0.37 |
-0.05 |
0.38 |
-1.00 |
6c. Have you experienced guilt because of your
drinking or use? |
0.22 |
0.41 |
0.18 |
0.39 |
-0.07 |
0.36 |
-1.43 |
6d. Do you need an eye opener in the morning
to get started? |
0.09 |
0.29 |
0.02 |
0.13 |
-0.08 |
0.33 |
-1.93 |
6e.
Never used or # of ‘yes’ answers |
1.80 |
1.21 |
1.52 |
0.98 |
-0.25 |
1.08 |
-1.84 |
7. Which of the following best describes your
current financial situation? |
2.54 |
1.12 |
2.61 |
0.92 |
0.07 |
0.93 |
-0.66 |
8. Which of the following best describes your
current housing situation? |
1.43 |
0.82 |
1.45 |
0.89 |
0.01 |
0.71 |
0.17 |
9. How would you best describe your current
feeling of general safety? |
2.22 |
0.92 |
2.19 |
0.84 |
-0.03 |
0.87 |
-0.28 |
10. Which of following best describes your
current involvement with police, court or jail? |
1.57 |
1.08 |
1.43 |
0.96 |
-0.13 |
0.92 |
-1.20 |
Sum of Ratings
|
19.40 |
4.32 |
19.48 |
5.00 |
0.07 |
4.92 |
-0.12 |
Notes: 1) Lower scores indicate higher levels of functioning;
2) Positive Difference Scores indicate worse
functioning; negative differences
indicate better functioning
TABLE SEVEN
Changes in Client Status Review
(based on 67 pairs matched by ARORA number)
Question |
No Change |
Decrease |
Increase |
McNemar
c4 |
1.
How
often are you currently involved in activities that are important to you? |
35 |
16 |
16 |
0 |
2.
How
often do physical health problems currently keep you from doing your normal
activities? |
35 |
18 |
14 |
0.28 |
3. How often
can you currently get the physical health care that you need? |
29 |
26 |
12 |
4.45* |
4. How is your
health care paid for? |
47 |
8 |
12 |
0.45 |
5. During the
last 6 months, how many times have you been hospitalized for mental health
treatment? |
58 |
4 |
5 |
0 |
6a. Have
friends/relatives asked you to cut down on alcohol or other drugs or to quit
entirely? |
54 |
12 |
1 |
7.69* |
6b. Are you
annoyed by friends/relatives who question your use? |
53 |
11 |
3 |
3.50 |
6c. Have you
experienced guilt because of your drinking or use? |
52 |
13 |
2 |
6.67* |
6d. Do you need
an eye opener in the morning to get started? |
54 |
12 |
1 |
7.69* |
6e. Never used or # of ‘yes’ answers |
44 |
15 |
8 |
1.57 |
7. Which of the
following best describes your current financial situation? |
44 |
15 |
8 |
0 |
8. Which of the
following best describes your current housing situation? |
56 |
6 |
5 |
0 |
9. How would
you best describe your current feeling of general safety? |
32 |
18 |
17 |
0 |
10. Which of
the following categories best describes your current involvement with police,
court or jail? |
55 |
8 |
4 |
0.75 |
Sum of Ratings |
4 |
32 |
31 |
0 |
Note: Corrected for continuity. * p
< .05.
TABLE EIGHT
MHSIP (Adult)
(Based on 112 surveys
returned at Time One (T1) and 53 at Time Two (T2))
1.
I like the services that I receive here. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Strongly Agree |
Agree |
Neutral |
Disagree |
Strongly Disagree |
N/A |
No Response |
Mean SD |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
51 45.5% |
28 52.8% |
37 33.0% |
16 30.2% |
16 14.3% |
6 11.3% |
2 1.8% |
1 1.9% |
1 0.9% |
1 1.9% |
2 1.8% |
0 |
3 2.7% |
1 1.9% |
1.74 0.85 |
1.67 0.90 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.
If I had other options, I would still get services from this agency. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
42 37.5% |
21 39.6% |
40 35.7% |
14 26.4% |
17 15.2% |
11 20.8% |
7 6.3% |
4 7.5% |
1 0.9% |
1 1.9% |
2 1.8% |
0 |
3 2.7% |
2 3.8% |
1.93 0.95 |
2.02 1.07 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.
I would recommend this agency to a friend or family member. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
48 42.9% |
25 47.2% |
36 32.1% |
19 35.8% |
17 15.2% |
3 5.7% |
4 3.6% |
4 7.5% |
1 0.9% |
0 |
2 1.8% |
1 1.9% |
4 3.6% |
1 1.9% |
1.81 0.91 |
1.73 0.90 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.
The location of the services was convenient (parking, public
transportation, distance, etc.) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
39 34.8% |
24 45.3% |
48 42.9% |
16 30.2% |
7 6.3% |
8 15.1% |
5 4.5% |
1 1.9% |
7 6.3% |
3 5.7% |
2 1.8% |
0 |
4 3.6% |
1 1.9% |
1.99 1.11 |
1.90 1.11 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5.
Staff was willing to see me as often as I felt it was necessary. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
45 40.2% |
25 47.2% |
38 33.9% |
19 35.8% |
11 9.8% |
6 11.3% |
9 8% |
2 3.8% |
2 1.8% |
0 |
2 1.8% |
0 |
5 4.5% |
1 1.9% |
1.90 1.02 |
1.71 0.82 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.
Staff returned my calls within 24 hours. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
47 42% |
17 32.1% |
38 33.9% |
23 43.4% |
9 8% |
6 11.3% |
5 4.5% |
4 7.5% |
2 1.8% |
1 1.9% |
7 6.3% |
1 1.9% |
4 3.6% |
1 1.9% |
1.78 0.94 |
2.00 0.98 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7.
Services were available at times that were good for me. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
49 43.8% |
20 37.7% |
44 39.3% |
25 47.2% |
12 10.7% |
6 11.3% |
2 1.8% |
1 1.9% |
2 1.8% |
0 |
1 0.9% |
0 |
2 1.8% |
1 1.9% |
1.75 0.86 |
1.77 0.73 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8.
I was able to get all the services I thought I needed. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
40 35.7% |
21 39.6% |
40 35.7% |
19 35.8% |
12 10.7% |
7 13.2% |
13 11.6% |
5 9.4% |
2 1.8% |
0 |
1 0.9% |
0 |
4 3.6% |
1 1.9% |
2.04 1.07 |
1.92 0.97 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9.
I was able to see a psychiatrist when I wanted to. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
33 29.5% |
18 34% |
39 34.8% |
23 43.4% |
16 14.3% |
4 7.5% |
9 8% |
4 7.5% |
4 3.6% |
1 1.9% |
6 5.4% |
1 1.9% |
5 4.5% |
2 3.8% |
2.13 1.09 |
1.94 0.98 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10.
Staff here believe that I can grow, change, and recover. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
50 44.6% |
26 49.1% |
38 33.9% |
16 30.2% |
15 13.4% |
7 13.2% |
2 1.8% |
1 1.9% |
1 0.9% |
1 1.9% |
3 2.7% |
1 1.9% |
3 2.7% |
1 1.9% |
1.74 0.84 |
1.73 0.92 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11.
I felt comfortable asking questions about my treatment and medication. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Strongly Agree |
Agree |
Neutral |
Disagree |
Strongly Disagree |
N/A |
No Response |
Mean SD |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
40 35.7% |
20 37.7% |
51 45.5% |
26 49.1% |
10 8.9% |
5 9.4% |
4 3.6% |
0 |
1 0.9% |
1 1.9% |
3 2.7% |
0 |
3 2.7% |
1 1.9% |
1.82 0.83 |
1.77 0.78 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12.
I felt free to complain. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30 26.8% |
18 34% |
51 45.5% |
24 45.3% |
11 9.8% |
6 11.3% |
8 7.1% |
2 3.8% |
3 2.7% |
1 1.9% |
3 2.7% |
1 1.9% |
6 5.4% |
1 1.9% |
2.06 0.99 |
1.90 0.90 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13.
I was given information about my rights. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
38 33.9% |
18 34% |
46 41.1% |
21 39.6% |
14 12.5% |
9 17% |
7 6.3% |
2 3.8% |
3 2.7% |
0 |
2 1.8% |
1 1.9% |
2 1.8% |
2 3.8% |
1.99 1.00 |
1.90 0.84 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14.
Staff encouraged me to take responsibility for how I live my life. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
42 37.5% |
17 32.1% |
48 42.9% |
26 49.1% |
9 8% |
7 13.2% |
4 3.6% |
2 3.8% |
1 0.9% |
0 |
3 2.7% |
0 |
5 4.5% |
1 1.9% |
1.79 0.83 |
1.88 0.78 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.
Staff told me what side effects to watch out for. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
28 25% |
18 34% |
48 42.9% |
23 43.4% |
15 13.4% |
7 13.2% |
9 8% |
3 5.7% |
2 1.8% |
1 1.9% |
4 3.6% |
0 |
6 5.4% |
1 1.9% |
2.11 0.97 |
1.96 0.95 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16.
Staff respected my wishes about who is, and who is not, to be given
information about my treatment. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
46 41.1% |
23 43.4% |
42 37.5% |
20 37.7% |
12 10.7% |
7 13.2% |
3 2.7% |
1 1.9% |
2 1.8% |
0 |
4 3.6% |
0 |
3 2.7% |
2 3.8% |
1.79 0.90 |
1.73 0.78 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17.
I, not staff, decided my treatment goals. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24 21.4% |
13 24.5% |
45 40.2% |
18 34% |
18 16.1% |
6 11.3% |
11 9.8% |
10 18.9% |
5 4.5% |
3 5.7% |
6 5.4% |
1 1.9% |
3 2.7% |
2 3.8% |
2.30 1.09 |
2.44 1.25 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18.
Staff were sensitive to my cultural/ethnic background (race, religion,
language, etc.). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
33 29.5% |
21 39.6% |
47 42% |
17 32.1% |
15 13.4% |
8 15.1% |
2 1.8% |
3 5.7% |
0 |
0 |
10 8.9% |
2 3.8% |
5 4.5% |
2 3.8% |
1.86 0.75 |
1.86 0.91 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19.
Staff helped me obtain the information I needed so I could take charge
of managing my illness. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
36 32.1% |
19 35.8% |
42 37.5% |
26 49.1% |
20 17.9% |
4 7.5% |
5 4.5% |
2 3.8% |
2 1.8% |
0 |
4 3.6% |
0 |
3 2.7% |
2 3.8% |
2.00 0.95 |
1.78 0.76 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20.
I was encouraged to use consumer-run programs (support groups, drop-in
centers, crisis phone line, etc.). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
28 25% |
22 41.5% |
40 35.7% |
22 41.5% |
22 19.6% |
3 5.7% |
7 6.3% |
3 5.7% |
3 2.7% |
1 1.9% |
9 8% |
1 1.9% |
3 2.7% |
1 1.9% |
2.17 1.02 |
1.80 0.94 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Note: Gray
boxes provide Time One data; white boxes provide Time Two data
As a direct result of the services I received
here: |
|||||||||||||||||
21.
I deal more effectively with daily problems. |
|||||||||||||||||
Strongly Agree |
Agree |
Neutral |
Disagree |
Strongly Disagree |
N/A |
No Response |
Mean SD |
||||||||||
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
||
27 24.1% |
12 22.6% |
54 48.2% |
24 45.3% |
21 18.8% |
10 18.9% |
5 4.5% |
4 7.5% |
1 0.9% |
0 |
2 1.8% |
0 |
2 1.8% |
3 5.7% |
2.06 0.85 |
2.12 0.87 |
||
22.
I am better able to control my life. |
|||||||||||||||||
31 27.7% |
12 22.6% |
53 47.3% |
26 49.1% |
15 13.4% |
10 18.9% |
5 4.5% |
2 3.8% |
3 2.7% |
0 |
1 0.9% |
0 |
4 3.6% |
3 5.7% |
2.03 0.94 |
2.04 0.78 |
||
23.
I am better able to deal with crisis. |
|||||||||||||||||
24 21.4% |
12 22.6% |
53 47.3% |
28 52.8% |
22 19.6% |
3 5.7% |
6 5.4% |
6 11.3% |
1 0.9% |
0 |
1 0.9% |
0 |
5 4.5% |
4 7.5% |
2.12 0.86 |
2.06 0.90 |
||
24.
I am getting along better with my family. |
|||||||||||||||||
25 22.3% |
9 17% |
45 40.2% |
24 45.3% |
20 17.9% |
11 20.8% |
9 8% |
2 3.8% |
2 1.8% |
1 1.9% |
8 7.1% |
2 3.8% |
3 2.7% |
4 7.5% |
2.19 0.98 |
2.19 0.88 |
||
25.
I do better in social situations. |
|||||||||||||||||
16 14.3% |
10 18.9% |
51 45.5% |
19 35.8% |
25 22.3% |
8 15.1% |
10 8.9% |
11 20.8% |
2 1.8% |
1 1.9% |
3 2.7% |
1 1.9% |
5 4.5% |
3 5.7% |
2.34 0.92 |
2.47 1.12 |
||
26.
I do better in school and/or work. |
|||||||||||||||||
9 8% |
5 9.4% |
35 31.3% |
15 28.3% |
25 22.3% |
8 15.1% |
6 5.4% |
3 5.7% |
3 2.7% |
0 |
30 26.8% |
19 35.8% |
4 3.6% |
3 5.7% |
2.47 0.94 |
2.29 0.86 |
||
27.
My housing situation has improved. |
|||||||||||||||||
18 16.1% |
11 20.8% |
46 41.1% |
25 47.2% |
20 17.9% |
9 17% |
9 8% |
1 1.9% |
2 1.8% |
1 1.9% |
11 9.8% |
3 5.7% |
6 5.4% |
3 5.7% |
2.27 0.95 |
2.06 0.84 |
||
28.
My symptoms are not bothering me as much. |
|||||||||||||||||
22 19.6% |
12 22.6% |
44 39.3% |
23 43.4% |
24 21.4% |
8 15.1% |
12 10.7% |
5 9.4% |
5 4.5% |
2 3.8% |
1 0.9% |
0 |
4 3.6% |
3 5.7% |
2.38 1.08 |
2.24 1.06 |
||
Note: Gray boxes provide Time One data; white boxes provide
Time Two data
TABLE NINE
Changes in MHSIP – Adult: By question and domain subscales
(based on 42 pairs matched by demographics)
Question |
Time One |
Time Two |
Difference |
||||
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
t |
|
1. Like
services here |
1.76 |
0.92 |
1.60 |
0.77 |
-0.15 |
0.96 |
-0.97 |
2. If had
other options, still get services here |
1.93 |
1.03 |
2.05 |
1.05 |
0.13 |
1.22 |
0.65 |
3.
Recommend this agency |
1.75 |
0.93 |
1.68 |
0.82 |
-0.03 |
0.74 |
-0.22 |
4.
Location was convenient |
2.18 |
1.26 |
1.98 |
1.18 |
-0.15 |
0.89 |
-1.06 |
5. Staff
willing to see me as often as I felt was necessary |
2.03 |
1.12 |
1.71 |
0.86 |
-0.33 |
0.94 |
-2.18* |
6. Staff
returned calls w/in 24 hours |
1.87 |
1.10 |
1.93 |
0.93 |
0.11 |
1.09 |
0.60 |
7.
Services available at good times |
1.78 |
0.91 |
1.76 |
0.76 |
0 |
0.97 |
0 |
8. Got all
services I thought I needed |
2.12 |
1.22 |
1.98 |
1.02 |
-0.12 |
1.05 |
-0.74 |
9. Able to
see psychiatrist when I wanted to |
2.18 |
1.25 |
2.02 |
1.04 |
-0.10 |
1.05 |
-0.61 |
10. Staff
believe I can grow, change, recover |
1.88 |
0.88 |
1.63 |
0.80 |
-0.18 |
1.05 |
-1.07 |
11. Felt
comfortable asking questions about Tx & meds |
1.71 |
0.72 |
1.67 |
0.65 |
-0.02 |
0.85 |
-0.18 |
12. I felt
free to complain |
2.10 |
1.01 |
1.90 |
0.89 |
-0.21 |
1.06 |
-1.21 |
13. I was
given information about my rights |
1.60 |
0.77 |
1.78 |
0.82 |
-0.18 |
0.76 |
-1.48 |
14. Staff
encouraged me to take responsibility |
1.73 |
0.78 |
1.88 |
0.77 |
0.1 |
0.93 |
0.68 |
15. Staff
told me about side effects |
1.95 |
0.86 |
0.93 |
0.97 |
-0.05 |
0.95 |
-0.33 |
16. Staff
respected wishes about who is, is
not, to be given info |
1.75 |
0.87 |
1.67 |
0.79 |
-0.08 |
0.66 |
-0.72 |
17. I, not
staff, decided my Tx goals |
2.53 |
1.18 |
2.40 |
1.33 |
-0.13 |
1.40 |
-0.56 |
18. Staff
sensitive to cultural/ethnic background |
1.96 |
0.78 |
1.83 |
0.87 |
-0.11 |
0.89 |
-0.75 |
19. Staff
helped me get info to manage illness |
1.95 |
0.89 |
1.76 |
0.80 |
-0.2 |
0.97 |
-1.31 |
20.
Encouraged to use consumer programs |
2.15 |
1.01 |
1.73 |
0.84 |
-0.47 |
1.01 |
-2.90** |
21. Deal
more effectively with daily problems |
1.98 |
0.72 |
2.15 |
0.91 |
0.23 |
0.90 |
1.60 |
22. I am
better able to control my life |
2.05 |
1.00 |
2.07 |
0.82 |
0.08 |
0.92 |
0.52 |
23. I am
better able to deal with crisis |
2.05 |
1.05 |
2.15 |
0.92 |
0.22 |
1.00 |
1.31 |
Notes: 1) Lower scores indicate
higher levels of satisfaction
2) Positive differences indicate lower levels
of satisfaction; negative differences indicate higher levels of satisfaction
3) *p < .05; **p < .01
Question |
Time One |
Time Two |
Difference |
||||
Mean
|
SD |
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
t |
|
24. I am
getting along better with family |
2.21 |
0.95 |
2.15 |
0.93 |
-0.03 |
0.99 |
-0.17 |
25. I do
better in social situations |
2.33 |
0.88 |
2.44 |
1.18 |
0.13 |
1.06 |
0.76 |
26. I do
better in school and/or work |
2.80 |
1.03 |
2.28 |
0.94 |
-0.36 |
0.85 |
-2.01 |
27. My
housing situation has improved |
2.36 |
1.01 |
2.08 |
0.90 |
-0.31 |
1.01 |
-1.82 |
28.
Symptoms are not bothering me as much |
2.44 |
1.23 |
2.24 |
1.11 |
-0.15 |
1.12 |
-0.85 |
Domain Subscales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Access |
2.01 |
0.84 |
1.89 |
0.72 |
-0.10 |
0.67 |
-0.99 |
Quality of Treatment |
1.97 |
0.61 |
1.84 |
0.60 |
-0.14 |
0.53 |
-1.62 |
Outcomes |
2.25 |
0.70 |
2.20 |
0.75 |
-0.001 |
0.62 |
-0.01 |
General Satisfaction |
1.81 |
0.83 |
1.78 |
0.78 |
-0.02 |
0.80 |
-0.13 |
Notes: 1) Lower scores indicate higher levels of satisfaction
2)
Positive differences indicate lower levels of satisfaction; negative
differences indicate higher levels of
satisfaction
3) *p < .0; **p < .01
TABLE TEN
Changes in MHSIP – Adult: By question and domain subscales
(based on 42 pairs matched by
demographics)
Question |
No Change1 |
Higher Satisfaction |
Lower Satisfaction |
McNemar c4 |
1.
Like services here |
23 |
13 |
6 |
1.89 |
2. If had
other options, still get services here |
20 |
11 |
11 |
0 |
3.
Recommend this agency |
24 |
11 |
7 |
0.5 |
4.
Location was convenient |
20 |
14 |
8 |
1.14 |
5. Staff
willing to see me as often as I felt necessary |
29 |
11 |
2 |
4.92* |
6. Staff
returned calls w/in 24 hours |
23 |
8 |
11 |
0.21 |
7.
Services available at good times |
24 |
7 |
11 |
0.5 |
8. Got all
services I thought I needed |
26 |
10 |
6 |
0.56 |
9. Able to
see psychiatrist when I wanted to |
18 |
13 |
11 |
0.04 |
10. Staff
believe I can grow, change & recover |
21 |
14 |
7 |
1.71 |
11. Felt
comfortable asking questions about Tx & meds |
21 |
11 |
10 |
0 |
12. I felt
free to complain |
17 |
17 |
8 |
2.56 |
13. I was
given information about my rights |
22 |
14 |
6 |
2.45 |
14. Staff
encouraged me to take responsibility |
18 |
10 |
14 |
0.38 |
15. Staff
told me what side effects to watch out for |
19 |
13 |
10 |
0.17 |
16. Staff
respected wishes about who is, not given info |
23 |
12 |
7 |
0.84 |
17. I, not
staff, decided my Tx goals |
19 |
15 |
8 |
1.56 |
18. Staff
sensitive to my cultural/ethnic background |
17 |
17 |
8 |
2.56 |
19. Staff
helped me obtain info to manage my illness |
19 |
15 |
8 |
1.56 |
20.
Encouraged to use consumer-run programs |
19 |
19 |
4 |
8.52** |
21. I deal
more effectively with daily problems |
21 |
9 |
12 |
0.19 |
22. I am
better able to control my life |
18 |
12 |
12 |
0 |
23. I am
better able to deal with crisis |
19 |
12 |
11 |
0 |
24. I am
getting along better with my family |
17 |
15 |
10 |
0.64 |
25. I do
better in social situations |
16 |
15 |
11 |
0.35 |
26. I do
better in school and/or work |
7 |
31 |
4 |
19.31*** |
27. My
housing situation has improved |
14 |
21 |
7 |
6.04* |
28. My
symptoms are not bothering me as much |
18 |
15 |
9 |
1.04 |
Access |
7 |
19 |
16 |
0.11 |
Quality |
1 |
22 |
19 |
0.10 |
Outcome |
3 |
22 |
17 |
0.41 |
Satisfaction |
13 |
17 |
12 |
0.55 |
Notes: Corrected
for continuity. * p <
.05. ** p < .01. *** p <.001
TABLE ELEVEN
MHSIP - Families (YSS-F)
(Based on 12 surveys
returned at Time One and 0 at Time Two)
1.
Overall, I am satisfied with the services that my child received. |
||||||||||||||
Strongly Agree |
Agree |
Neutral |
Disagree |
Strongly Disagree |
N/A |
Mean SD |
||||||||
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
|
6 50% |
|
5 41.7% |
|
1 8.3% |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
1.58 0.67 |
|
|
As a result of the services my child
and/or family received: |
||||||||||||||
2.
My child is better at handling daily life. |
||||||||||||||
3 25% |
|
7 58.3% |
|
2 16.7% |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
1.92 0.69 |
|
|
3. My child gets along better with family members. |
||||||||||||||
2 16.7% |
|
8 66.7% |
|
2 16.7% |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
2.00 0.60 |
|
|
4.
My child gets along better with friends and other people. |
||||||||||||||
1 8.3% |
|
9 75% |
|
2 16.7% |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
2.08 0.51 |
|
|
5.
My child is doing better in school and/or work. |
||||||||||||||
2 16.7% |
|
7 58.3% |
|
1 8.3% |
|
2 16.7% |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
2.25 0.97 |
|
|
6.
My child is better able to cope when things go wrong. |
||||||||||||||
1 8.3% |
|
9 75% |
|
2 16.7% |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
2.08 0.51 |
|
|
7.
I am satisfied with our family life right now. |
||||||||||||||
2 16.7% |
|
2 16.7% |
|
4 33.3% |
|
3 25% |
|
1 8.3% |
|
0 |
|
2.92 1.24 |
|
|
Note: Lower scores indicate higher levels of satisfaction
Feedback about the services my child
and/or family received: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8.
I helped to choose my child’s services. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Strongly Agree |
Agree |
Neutral |
Disagree |
Strongly Disagree |
N/A |
Mean SD |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 33.3% |
|
7 58.3% |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
1 8.3% |
|
1.64 0.50 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9.
I helped to choose my child’s treatment goals. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 58.3% |
|
4 33.3% |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
1 8.3% |
|
1.36 0.50 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10.
The people helping my child stuck with us no matter what. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 50% |
|
4 33.3% |
|
2 16.7% |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
1.67 0.78 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11.
I felt my child had someone to talk to when he/she was troubled. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 41.7% |
6 50% |
|
0 |
|
1 8.3% |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
1.67 0.65 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12.
The people helping my child listened to what he/she had to say. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 33.3% |
|
7 58.3% |
|
1 8.3% |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
1.75 0.62 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13.
I was frequently involved in my child’s treatment. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 33.3% |
|
7 58.3% |
|
1 8.3% |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
1.75 0.62 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14.
The services my child and/or family received were right for us. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 33.3% |
|
7 58.3% |
|
1 8.3% |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
1.75 0.62 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.
The location of services was convenient for us. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 25% |
|
7 58.3% |
|
1 8.3% |
|
1 8.3% |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
2.00 0.85 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16.
Services were available at times that were convenient for us. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 25% |
|
6 50% |
|
2 16.7% |
|
1 8.3% |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
2.08 0.90 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17.
If I need services for my child in the future, I would use these
services again. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 41.7% |
|
4 33.3% |
|
2 16.7% |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
1 8.3% |
|
1.73 0.79 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Note: Lower scores
indicate higher levels of satisfaction |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18.
My family got the help we wanted for my child. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Strongly Agree |
Agree |
Neutral |
Disagree |
Strongly Disagree |
N/A |
Mean SD |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 25% |
|
6 50% |
|
2 16.7% |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
1 8.3% |
|
1.91 0.70 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19.
My family got as much help as we needed for my child. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 41.7% |
|
4 33.3% |
|
3 25% |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
1.83 0.83 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20. My child and family’s needs
determined my child’s treatment goals. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 33.3% |
|
7 58.3% |
|
1 8.3% |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
1.75 0.62 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21.
Staff treated me with respect. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 58.3% |
|
5 41.7% |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
1.42 0.51 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22.
Staff understood my family’s cultural traditions. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 16.7% |
|
4 33.3% |
|
3 25% |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
3 25% |
|
2.11 0.78 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23.
Staff respected my family’s religious/spiritual beliefs. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 8.3% |
|
6 50% |
|
2 16.7% |
|
0 |
0 |
|
3 25% |
|
2.11 0.60 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24. Staff spoke with me in a way that I understood. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 25% |
|
9 75% |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
1.75 0.45 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
25.
Staff were sensitive to my cultural/ethnic background. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 8.3% |
|
4 33.3% |
|
2 16.7% |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
5 41.7% |
|
2.14 0.69 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26.
I felt we were discriminated against while trying to get services
here. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 |
|
0 |
|
1 8.3% |
|
1 8.3% |
|
9 75% |
|
1 8.3% |
|
1.27 0.65 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Note: Lower scores indicate higher levels of satisfaction
TABLE TWELVE
MHSIP – Youth (YSS)
(Based on 6 surveys
returned at Time One and 1 at Time Two)
1.
Overall, I am satisfied with the services that I received. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Strongly Agree |
Agree |
Neutral |
Disagree |
Strongly Disagree |
N/A |
Mean SD |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
2 33.3% |
1 100% |
3 50% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2.00 1.09 |
0 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
As a result of the services I received: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.
I am better at handling daily life. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 16.7% |
0 |
2 33.3% |
1 100% |
1 16.7% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
2.00 0.82 |
0 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
3.
I get along better with family members. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 16.7% |
0 |
3 50% |
0 |
1 16.7% |
1 100% |
0 |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2.20 1.10 |
0 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
4.
I get along better with friends and other people. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 16.7% |
0 |
3 50% |
0 |
0 |
1 100% |
0 |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
1.75 0.50 |
0 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
5.
I am doing better in school and/or work. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 16.7% |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
1 16.7% |
1 100% |
2 33.3% |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2.80 1.20 |
0 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
6.
I am better able to cope when things go wrong. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 16.7% |
0 |
4 66.7% |
1 100% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1.80 0.45 |
0 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
7.
I am satisfied with my family life right now. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 33.3% |
0 |
3 50% |
1 100% |
0 |
1 100% |
0 |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1.60 0.55 |
0 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Feedback about the services I received: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8.
I helped to choose my services. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 16.7% |
0 |
3 50% |
1 100% |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2.67 1.51 |
0 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
9.
I helped to choose my treatment goals. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 16.7% |
0 |
4 66.7% |
1 100% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2.33 1.37 |
0 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes: 1) Lower scores indicate higher levels of
satisfaction |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2) Gray boxes
provide Time One data; white boxes provide Time Two data |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10.
The people helping me stuck with me no matter what. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Strongly Agree |
Agree |
Neutral |
Disagree |
Strongly Disagree |
N/A |
Mean SD |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
1 16.7% |
1 100% |
3 50% |
0 |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
0 |
2.40 1.52 |
0 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
11.
I felt I had someone to talk to when I was troubled. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 16.7% |
0 |
4 66.7% |
1 100% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
0 |
1.80 0.45 |
0 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
12.
The people helping me listened to what I had to say. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 33.3% |
0 |
3 50% |
1 100% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
0 |
1.60 0.55 |
0 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
13.
I was actively involved in my own treatment. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 16.7% |
0 |
3 50% |
1 100% |
0 |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 16.7% |
|
2.20 1.11 |
0 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
14.
I received the services that were right for me. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 16.7% |
0 |
1 16.7% |
1 100% |
2 33.3% |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
2.60 1.14 |
0 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
15.
The location of services was convenient. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 |
0 |
4 66.7% |
1 100% |
0 |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
2.40 0.89 |
0 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
16.
Services were available at times that were convenient for me. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 16.7% |
0 |
1 16.7% |
1 100% |
0 |
0 |
2 33.3% |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
3.20 1.64 |
0 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
17.
If I need services in the future, I would use these services again. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 16.7% |
0 |
3 50% |
1 100% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
2.40 1.52 |
0 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
18.
I got the help I wanted. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 |
0 |
4 66.7% |
1 100% |
0 |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
2.40 0.89 |
0 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
19.
I got as much help as I needed. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 16.7% |
0 |
2 33.3% |
1 100% |
0 |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
2.25 1.26 |
0 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes: 1) Lower scores indicate higher levels of
satisfaction |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2) Gray boxes provide
Time One data; white boxes provide Time Two data |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20.
I, not staff, determined my treatment goals. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Strongly Agree |
Agree |
Neutral |
Disagree |
Strongly Disagree |
N/A |
Mean SD |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
T1 |
T2 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
0 |
0 |
1 16.7% |
1 100% |
2 33.3% |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
3.40 1.14 |
0 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
21.
Staff treated me with respect. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 50% |
0 |
2 33.3% |
1 100% |
1 16.7% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1.67 0.82 |
0 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
22.
Staff understood my family’s cultural traditions. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 33.3% |
0 |
2 33.3% |
1 100% |
0 |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
2.00 1.22 |
0 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
23.
Staff respected my family’s religious/spiritual beliefs. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 50% |
0 |
2 33.3% |
1 100% |
1 16.7% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1.67 0.82 |
0 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
24.
Staff spoke with me in a way that I understood. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 50% |
0 |
3 50% |
1 100% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1.50 0.55 |
0 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
25.
Staff were sensitive to my cultural/ethnic background. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 33.3% |
0 |
2 33.3% |
1 100% |
2 33.3% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2.00 0.89 |
0 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
26.
I felt discriminated against while trying to get services here. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 16.7% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 16.7% |
0 |
1 16.7% |
1 100% |
3 50% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3.83 1.60 |
0 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Notes: 1) Lower scores indicate higher levels of
satisfaction |
2) Gray boxes
provide Time One data; white boxes provide Time Two data |
APPENDIX
ONE
Qualitative
Comments:
Client
Status Review
Follow-up Questions - Consumer Comments
1.
Were any of the questions hard to answer? Which ones? Why?
Alternatives
·
None
·
No, they were boring
·
No (4)
Bristol Bay
· No, just weird
· No, they’re good
· No, the feeling safe questions was hard to understand
· All of them – don’t like nosey people
· They weren’t hard to answer.
· Yes, #2, 3, 10 – hard to understand
· #4 and 10
· Yes, #9 – don’t understand what is meant
· No comments
· No (11)
Norton Sound
· Yes. The questions assuming substance abuse and problems with the law are offensive.
· Yes, #10
· Some hard, didn’t know what was wanted
·
No comments (5)
LifeQuest
·
Understood all questions
·
No, I understood most of the questions.
·
None
·
No (28)
·
No comments (7)
·
Yes, questions 6-10 – does not apply to consumer
age.
·
Yes, doesn’t apply to consumer’s age
·
Yes, I resent this survey.
·
Regarding finances
·
Yes, had to clarify
·
Yes, #3 – I just don’t understand; #4 – Medicaid
·
#4 because of Medicaid & copay
·
Some vague – need to clarify
·
# 4 & 5 - Is health care same as mental
health care?
·
Yes, #4 – hard to figure since I have Medicaid and
Medicare and have to pay copay, a minor amount.
·
#1, 2, 4, 9 – just don’t understand the wording.
·
Yes, #6 – confusing terms & sentence
formation
·
Yes, the one talking about alcohol kind of made
me nervous (#6)
·
#6 – Poor English!!! ‘No to all of the ???’ Very poor English – yes to none = No to
all!
·
#6 – felt it was intrusive
·
#6 – about drugs
·
#6 – you assume I’m alcoholic.
·
Yes, #6 because there was no section for a
non-drug user
·
Questions about drugs
·
Yes, #6.
I have 3 years clean and nowhere to note it.
·
Yes, 6a.
Not family. Who are friends?
·
Yes, the second half of #6, the wording is too
confusing.
·
All of them took some time
·
Felt questions and choices were confusing
SCC
·
Not really (2)
·
None. At
the most they were pretty good questions
·
Not with help
·
Yes
·
Yes – income & activities – difficult to
figure out
·
Most were hard to answer
·
A little – about financial & people talking
about drugs/alcohol
·
Yes, all of them. I have to ask for help and its personal to me. It’s hard to answer questions that bring
memories of my past.
·
Kind of:
#1
·
#3 – no option appropriate to my situation; just
don’t seek health care for self although covered
·
The health care – I pay my own insurance and
there is no question for this.
·
#3 – Can’t get the medical services due to lack
of coverage
·
#4 – confusing
·
#6 – Never used – of course I have had sips of
wine
·
Yes, #6 – worded strangely for option 1
·
Yes, probably the alcohol use and drug use
‘cause maybe they’re hard to answer
·
Yes, the one about alcohol use – ‘I wasn’t, but
I had one slip.’
·
Little bit - #7
·
Yes, #8 – don’t know when I have to leave
temporary rental situation
·
Yes, #8 – housing – don’t know if I’m
independent or not; very dependent on various agencies
·
#9 – Safety
·
#9 – Safety includes worries about loss of
benefits or homelessness
·
#9 – hard to feel save when hearing about
community violence that may not directly affect me.
·
Yes, #10 because I got in trouble a year and
half ago
·
#10 – difficult to know if it applied to
situation
·
Financial one – personally don’t know where I
stand
·
I think if I didn’t get therapy, I wouldn’t be
alone
·
I just wish I could go somewhere else. There is no staff that has been here as long
as I have (8 years). It gets confusing.
·
No (46)
2.
Were any of the questions unclear?
Which ones? Why?
Alternatives
·
None
·
Yeah, medical - #3 – choices? Further define physical health care
·
No (4)
Bristol Bay
· I understood all questions.
· Everything was good
· No comments (3)
· No (12)
Norton Sound
·
Financial & health care available
·
#1 – ‘nebulous’
·
No comments (3)
LifeQuest
·
No, most I understood.
·
None
·
Yes, none applied
·
Yes, didn’t ring a bell with me personally
·
Yes, all
LifeQuest (continued)
·
They were annoying.
·
None applied
·
None applied – make one for child that applies
·
#1 – chose to live with family members who help
care for me; I pay rent. #10 –
sometimes feel unsafe due to paranoia – no real threat.
·
#1 – level of activity – how defined for a home
schooled child?
·
#2 – I have weight problems that effects mental
health that keeps me from normal activities.
·
#2 – unsure about ‘physical’
·
#3 & 4
·
Yes, #4 & #6. #4 doesn’t address Medicaid/Medicare clearly
·
#5 – Crisis Respite 3X
·
As the parent of the client, I answered them
about her with feedback from her. Or
was I supposed to answer them about myself?
·
#6
·
#6 – client sober 8 months. Answers ‘yes’ refer to previous time period.
·
Yes, the second part of #6
·
#9 – client says they know they are safe –
suffers paranoia.
·
#9 – because of lack of boundaries with my
behavior
·
#9 – I know I am safe where I’m at, but don’t
always feel like it
·
Health questions – some services not covered
·
#10 – there are many restraints
·
All of them took some time
·
No comments (8)
·
No (28)
SCC
·
Yes, #1 – meaningful activity?
·
Yes – all
·
Most need clarification to understand
·
See comments above re: #3
·
#4, #7 – confusing
·
#4
·
Yes, number 6 & 10
·
Yes, #6
·
Yes, #6 - confusing
·
Yes, #7, 8 & 9
·
Not sure, no
·
No comments
·
No (54)
3.
Do you have any other comments?
(Use reverse side if needed)
Alternatives
·
Should make a form for the parent specifically to
answer for the child.
·
No (5)
Bristol Bay
· None
· No, good survey
· No comments (5)
· #6 – ‘Don’t drink!’ was added
· Yes, I need more income for my needs
· I think I answer most of the questions correctly
· No (11)
Norton Sound
·
The survey seems too short
·
This was stupid
·
No comments (4)
LifeQuest
·
None (2)
·
No, good job
·
I enjoy the questions.
·
I already commented.
·
Its fine.
(2)
·
Some are irrelevant.
·
Who might this information be going to?
LifeQuest (continued)
·
What are you trying to determine? #8 should not be on survey
·
Yes, I wish we did more like field trips and
stuff in our program, and maybe a car wash or something to raise money.
·
I don’t think these questions are necessary.
·
The purpose isn’t clear, but if it’s necessary,
I’m more than happy to comply.
·
These were interesting questions to answer. They told me the things in my life dealing
with stress. It asked how often I did
activities.
·
Drug & alcohol users usually have denial or
minimization of problems.
·
Case manager’s office isn’t private enough; so
don’t see her often as needed.
·
I really like my caseworker. She isn’t demanding and does not have unreal
expectations of me.
·
Does a person locked up figure in this survey,
and how is there someone to provide them with a copy of this survey to fill
out? I think LifeQuest needs to hire
more capable case managers. The ones I
have dealt with seem to be quite overworked.
·
#3, answer 4 – I have not been able to find a
doctor that treats FMS & MPS
·
#3 – I need dental & just filled out grant
through dental program
·
Q3 – often disabled by symptoms – so don’t
access care that is readily available
·
#4 – Medicaid & Medicare needed to be
specified
·
#4 – Medicaid & Medicare don’t seem to be
listed and should be
·
#4, answer 1, except for Medicaid copay (2)
·
#4, answer 1 – Medicaid
·
#4 – some services are not included
·
#4, answer 2 – through SSI and Medicaid
·
#6, no longer use alcohol or drugs
·
Q6 – no way to indicate if in recovery and for
how long
·
#6 – no answer was selected, but comment ‘sober
for 9 years’ added
·
#6 – I don’t drink and you should have asked if
I did before you implied that I needed to answer these questions
·
#7, answer 4 – eye care, over counter
medication, food, clothing
·
#8, answer 2 – pay rent
·
Q8 – No way to indicate if in
homeless/transitional housing
·
Next to #9 client wrote ‘I am referring to my
state of mind, how I get to stressful situations, I sometimes go into thinking
about killing myself when things become stressful for me.’
·
#9, answer 5 – due to symptoms of schizophrenia
·
#9 – feel physically safe; feel unfairly
complained about to landlord by neighbor’s because of drinking behavior
·
#9, answer 3 – has anxiety disorder
·
#9, answer 3 – teenage neighbor’s following me
·
#10, answer 1 was checked, but ‘unknown if any’
added
·
No comments (18)
·
No (25)
SCC
·
No (35)
·
No, not really
·
I don’t know
·
I didn’t like intrusive questions.
·
I support Building Bridges. I would like to attend as many groups as I
want to.
·
It seems OK
·
I support this questionnaire
·
Thanks for asking
SCC (continued)
·
No one will help wean me off prescription meds
& on anti-narcotics – can’t do in hospital – was
told Medicaid/Medicare
won’t cover unless emergency
·
Need to ask if they’re adequate after
hospitalization
·
This is not necessary to ask questions that
bring memories of the past. I want to
get on with present and future.
·
I am paying a lot of money for medications –
Need help with this
·
These aren’t the kind of questions I think of
everyday. It’s not enough from life in
general.
·
I would like to get mental health services more
often, but Medicaid regs prohibit that; fewer groups than previously engaged
in.
·
Question #3 – pain pills don’t go with psych
meds; do without pain meds
·
Not asking questions that may be of help; in
your opinion, how has counseling helped health improving (scale of 1-5)? What do you feel has been helping the most?
·
#3 – I do not have access to medical care even
thought I have Medicaid
·
#6d – coffee should be added
·
#6 – doesn’t address coffee as an ‘eye opener’
·
Yes, I like the ones on alcohol use and drug use
and other questions
·
If I didn’t have my restraining order, I would
be feeling better about things that come along.
·
It is hard to find doctors that accept Medicaid
·
No comments (17)
Follow-up Questions - Clinician Comments
1.
Did consumers have problems with any of the questions? Which questions? What problems?
Alternatives
· No (5)
· None
· Yes, #7 – Kids questioned if this relates to their finances or their parents? #8 – The parents own; the kids live with their parents. Question doesn’t make sense.
· No comments
Norton Sound
·
Wording unclear
·
#3 – ‘loaded’, not a lot of appts are made and
followed
·
#7 – ‘gap’ between answers 1 & 2; ‘assets’
not listed
·
#1 – ‘important’ meaning ‘enjoyable’? Critical to survival? Maybe two questions would be clearer
·
#4 – cost of insurance itself
·
#7 – vague – ‘financial concerns’ is more than
basic needs
· No comments (3)
Bristol Bay
· Helped her read the questions. They were asked pretty clearly and straightforward.
· Yes, he missed half or more of the forms.
· No (4)
· None (2)
· Didn’t seem to.
· No comments (9)
LifeQuest
· No (21)
·
No, I reworded them with client’s name instead of ‘you’
since I was asking the parent.
· No, I reworded them with client’s name instead of ‘you’ since I was asking the parent instead due to the age of the client.
· No comments (23)
· the questions.
· Yes, all – doesn’t apply to age category (2)
· Yes, needed situational descriptions
· Yes, client’s thinking is tangential at this time, and he had difficulty w/answers.
· Just #2
· #3 & 4
· #4 – co-pay for multiple meds can add up to expense that impacts budget
· Yes, #4. It was hard to understand – should have had more categories.
· Yes, #4 & #6 – confusing wordage
·
Yes, #6 (2)
·
#6 –
client is almost 1 year sober – answers refer to when they were drinking; #9 – client says feels unsafe due to symptoms
sometimes
·
#6 – unsure if caffeine is considered a drug
· Client chose to answer only one part of Question 6
· The one relating to alcohol (#6) was again a problem, as this client has no C/D issues. Also, the question regarding safety (#9) was answered from the point of view of an individual with anxiety & paranoia.
· Yes, some questions are vague and need situational description. These questions seem rather ‘adult’.
SCC
·
No (25)
·
No, she didn’t appear to
·
No, difficult to keep client focused
·
Comments given on previous surveys
·
No comments (23)
·
#1 – 2 days per week would equal 7 days a month,
thus answers 2 and 3 overlap
·
#1 – Consumers had difficulty with this question
as attending agency group activities was not an identified option, and they
required assistance in problem solving to identify this as an active area for
them. ‘Not active’ appears as if the
consumer never does any activity. It
may be better to state a choice such as ‘rarely active, minimally active, etc.’
·
#4.
Several consumers had difficulty deciding between ‘fully insured’ and
‘well insured’ as with Medicaid not all services are paid for and there is at
times a small fee.
·
#5 – The 6 month timeframe is problematic
because these surveys were given so close together. For example, if a client was in API four months ago, on both
administration of the survey, the client would answer #2 (1 time), even if the
client had not been in API since the previous survey. Also, is CTC stay considered hospitalization? Is inpatient treatment at Clitheroe
considered hospitalization? Should it
make a difference whether or not hospitalization was voluntary?
·
#5. Many
of the consumers had difficulty with this question as they felt that
‘hospitalization’ should include our Crisis Treatment Center services, which
many had utilized within the past 6 months.
·
#6
·
#6 – Consumer was unsure on how to answer
question concerning alcohol since he used to be an alcoholic; however, is no
longer using.
SCC (continued)
·
#6 continues to be a poorly worded question as
many of those who participated do not use drugs or alcohol and felt this
question assumed that they did and thus several answered that they were
‘annoyed’ by being asked by others about use in response to question on
questionnaire. It also fails to
identify tobacco and/or caffeine use, which was stated as an ‘eye-opener’ and
is prevalent among this population.
·
In #6d, consumer unsure if question considered
caffeine a drug
·
#6 – consumer doesn’t currently use alcohol or
drugs
·
#6 – unsure if cigarettes are considered a drug;
#6d – coffee
·
#6 – consumer reported feeling guilty about
having one relapse with alcohol use.
·
#8 – this questions continues to not address
transitional housing. Does this fit
into the homeless category?
·
#10 – client was not sure how to answer – need
an option for Title 12 status.
·
Each person seems to interpret things a little
differently. Some need more help than
others. This person worked to fill it
out him or herself.
·
Client’s situation didn’t fit neatly in any
categories for #7, 8 & 9
2.
Were any of the questions unclear?
If yes, please tell us which questions were unclear.
Alternatives
· No (5)
· None
· Yes, #7 & 8 (explained above)
· No comments
Bristol Bay
· Not for this client
· Some are unclear – vocabulary, overall ‘too much’
· This has many questions that he did not find easy to understand
· #6 – should ask if any use first
· None
· No (7)
· No comments (5)
· #3 – Unclear as to what is being asked. Word it clearer about access to health care.
· #1, 2, 3
Norton Sound
·
#1 – clinician wrote that client ‘doesn’t count
work’ as activity
·
#6, answer 1 – weird phrasing – double negative
· No comments (4)
LifeQuest
·
No, just uncomfortable
·
No (24)
· No comments (24)
·
#1 – Medicaid
·
Not worded for parents to answer for a child; #1
– ‘if you weren’t doing one of those things, you’d be dead’ was the comment
from the parent.
·
#3 & 4 – because Medicaid is not listed,
some cannot answer the question.
·
#4 – see comment above
·
Question 4 – Medicaid
·
Yes, #4 & #6
·
#5
·
Yes, some seem ‘adult’
LifeQuest (continued)
·
#7 – client manages to get needs met, but is
under great stress trying to pay off past debt; #9 – client is paranoid and is
aware of the condition. Staff cannot
identify any threat to safety.
·
#9 – feels unsafe due to own actions, not from
environment
·
#9 – client felt unsafe due to recognized
paranoia; acknowledged no identifiable threat.
·
Client had a difficult time answering all of the
questions.
SCC
·
#6 – define current drug use clearer
·
#6
·
#6 – consumers find it difficult to
differentiate whether question is pertaining to past or present use.
·
Possibly #6
·
#10 was a little unclear in terms of
non-criminal involvement – Client is in the middle of taking someone else to
court over reportedly stolen things.
·
#10 – there was one consumer who has to be
registered with the State, but didn’t know what his legal status was as it
didn’t appear to fit in any category specifically, as probation period had
ended though he continues to be mandated by the State to report for the
offense.
·
No comments (32)
·
No (27)
3.
Were there things we did not ask that you feel we should add?
Alternatives
· None (7)
· No comments
Bristol Bay
·
Nothing
·
None
·
No (5)
·
No comments (8)
·
Ask about perceived access to mental health
·
Need to ask whether client drinks/drugs
Norton Sound
· No comments (5)
· Types of support services available
LifeQuest
·
No (26)
· None (2)
· No comments (26)
·
Yes, is treatment confidential (private)? Not in case manager’s office? (Client comment recorded by clinician)
·
You should have asked more about mental health.
·
Yes, how we feel about different emotions (Client
comment recorded by clinician)
·
#6 doesn’t address caffeine use or address no
use of drugs or alcohol
·
Many things – TX results over time; lack of
improvement and reasons
SCC
·
No (25)
·
No comments (36)
·
Question #1 may include SCC group activities
·
Questions about medications – client
satisfaction, complaints, etc. All are
on meds – some controversial.
·
Is the care you are receiving adequate in your
opinion? (comment from client
recorded by clinician)
·
Symptoms/meds – satisfaction, effectiveness,
side effects
·
For all questionnaires: How satisfied are you with your
medications? What side effects do you
experience? How consistently do you
take your medications?
·
See previous surveys
·
Already addressed
4.
Do you have any other comments?
Alternatives
· None (3)
· #3 – What are the choices? Whenever available.
· Again, mostly these questions (3, 4, 7, 8) do not pertain to the child themselves, mostly the parent.
·
#9 – too much use of the word ‘safe’ was written
in
·
What are you attempting to determine?
·
This survey is not very appropriate for some
clients as the answers you get back may be very misleading.
Bristol Bay
·
None
·
No (6)
·
No comments (9)
·
Does not seem to be valuable or as workable in
rural/bush setting
·
This is hard to do in rural setting
·
Pretty user-friendly. Do you want to ask if people are satisfied with the
services? Are you treated with respect
for your person and culture?
·
I enjoyed the questions. (Client comment recorded by clinician)
·
Client filled out independently, though client
asked staff for clarification on many questions.
Norton Sound
· No comments (5)
LifeQuest
· No (17)
·
No comments (34)
·
Client objected to #6. She felt it implied that she had a drug or drinking problem.
·
She (client) said it was unnecessary.
·
Some questions need to be clearer.
·
Had staff assistance filling this out
·
Client filled out independently. Staff provided clarification on a couple of
questions.
·
Staff helped client fill this out.
·
Client filled out/completed independently (3)
·
#4 – ‘Medicaid’ written in (2)
·
#7, answer 5 – ‘bio family’ was written in (2)
·
#9 – ‘fear of teasing & being picked on’
SCC
·
#4, Insurance – Our clients don’t have
insurance, they have Medicaid or Medicare – might include those terms in
question answers.
·
#6 – define current drug use a little more
·
#6, answer b & c – ‘when was using’ was
written in
SCC (continued)
·
#6 is difficult as the question appears to
assume to consumers that they use – does not address non-use
·
I think it would be helpful to add some questions
about medications, such as Are the medications working for them?; any
complaints, side effects, etc.? So much
of the treatment for this population is centered around medications. This may just reflect my bias regarding the
medications.
·
I can’t pin down why but this took way less time
this time around and fewer questions came up – for this particular client
anyway.
·
Current GAF:
I have tried to provide the date of the most current GAF. There will not be any change in GAF between
the two survey administrations unless the client was evaluated between the two
administrations and the medical provider diagnosed a change. In other words, no change in GAF may be
meaningless. For this to really work,
the GAF should be calculated at the time the survey is given I think.
·
Already addressed
·
Thank you for the opportunity to participate in
this survey. It has been an enjoyable
experience and given me the opportunity to interact with some consumers I do
not have regular contact with and explore consumer understanding of self-needs,
desires and expectations of self and agency.
·
Client was not interested. Questions had to be asked several times.
·
No (23)
·
No comments (33)
APPENDIX
TWO
Qualitative
Comments:
Demographic
Questionnaire (Adult)
Question 9. Comments.
Is there anything else that you would like to tell us about yourself or
the services you receive that might help us to better serve you?
Bristol Bay
· No (2)
· No comments (5)
· I have a mental disorder and am labeled as a person with chronic disorder or schizophrenia. I have for long time been treated for and I like being treated with my schizophrenia, thanks to medication and my involvement with BB Mental Health, so I don’t have to go far away from my hometown. Bristol Bay is my hometown and this is where I have improved and I like their services. More better to be around with and learn to like myself and others around me. I thank them very much.
· Scott has made a great outcome on bringing out the qualities I’ve hidden for so long. Thank you for all your help. It means a lot to me.
· Having no health aid and no August card. States need more aid.
· My counselor was excellent and really helped me through a traumatic time in my life.
· I’m all right.
· Did not receive services without interruption for 5+ yrs, but in that time span probably averaged 2 visits per month
· You guys are doing good. Keep up the good work.
· Some of the questions, wasn’t sure or don’t know – just answered
LifeQuest
· None
· No comments (6)
· Thank you for LifeQuest counselors. I’d be lost without them.
· I like that med-checks only last 30 minutes. I think groups are too long.
· I know that helping the homeless get Housing Program could be very useful. And emergency financial help for families that have an emergency.
· Your case managers need to be more aware of what resources are available for the consumer. I asked several counselors about Challenge AK. What a wonderful resource for outdoor recreation and self-esteem. However, the counselors at LifeQuest I talked to were unaware of this organization. Do you have a class for beginning adult reading? I’m tutoring one at the present. In this area there is a gap. Let’s dig deeper and inform all on the LifeQuest team what’s available instead of asking ‘What do you want?’, say ‘What about this program?’ and see if there’s an interest. Then keep challenging folks to try new things. I’m excited for LifeQuest keep growing and keep the heart
open for wisdom from God. He will guide in the ways and needs of His children!
· Wish we went more places like Disneyland or Sea World once in awhile or the zoo
LifeQuest (continued)
· Our case managers have too many, many clients so some folks get little help.
· Homeless/mentally ill need help finding and getting housing. Please reinstate.
· Have more groups. Implement recreational groups. Clubhouse type groups.
· Still having problems sleeping, getting along with people
· I need a lot of dental work done, but can’t afford it.
· I appreciate the service that I receive at LifeQuest. I am doing really good. Thanks!
· I’m happy.
· My doctor through LifeQuest has promised me 1-on-1 counseling since I started and I have yet to have this service. Also, my counselor has no privacy for us to talk about private things.
· The staff should be more personal with the patients.
· Conditions are very helpful for my schizophrenia and ____ me from mental illness.
· Thanks for being there. Please help me.
· Needed a lot more one-on-one therapy sessions.
Norton Sound
· No
· No comments (4)
· It’s a good program.
· I was very hesitant to use the NSHC BHS program because all the people I knew worked there were creepy. Upon meeting new staff members in a social setting, my opinion changed. I knew I needed the help and was thankful that they had new staff members.
SCC
· No (12)
· N/A
· None
· No comments (17)
· I like the medicine I take and I also take anger management and other counseling for my symptoms.
· People that are there all the time make me nervous. Sometimes I get the idea people are staring at me.
· I appreciate continuity and I get that from SCC.
· I would be dead without it.
· I have found everyone to be very helpful, friendly, from front desk staff to clinical staff, medical providers.
· The new medication; _____has helped me.
· Everything is great at SCC. Very nice people work there.
· The services are great. Groups are helpful.
· I feel like that I don’t trust nobody – what I hear in the back – they think it is a big joke – what is going on in your mind.
· Some of the topics in the group I attend (Building Blocks Group) are not applicable to my therapy issues, but I must attend the entire series anyway.
· Depends on which service.
· It has helped me a lot.
· I think the services at SCC are excellent.
· More groups for people with depression.
· Go on outreach more often.
· The services I received are excellent and extremely helpful. So much depends on the match-up with the right counselor, and I am lucky to have someone who is knowledgeable and very helpful.
SCC (continued)
· I’ll never again use the word ‘depression.’ I thought I was ____ with the feeling of sadness over my youngest daughter’s illness, but recently I read that the word is a psychiatric term.
· Case manager not very helpful.
· It would be helpful to have more groups (limited due to Medicaid regs).
· Crisis line is very helpful. It would be nice to have anonymous number so you don’t have to leave your name. Would be nice to have another place to call if it is not at crisis level yet.
· Nothing right now.
· Groups are good, but need to get more out going in the public.
· I don’t like sometimes how hard it is to get hold of your counselor.
· The staff listens when I relate problems or complain.
· I would appreciate more one-on-one time with employees. An elevator in the building because I am handicapped.
· Need someone to wean me off prescription narcotic meds
· I live through hell, but I try to look on the good side of life
· The SCC groups have been most helpful - a lifesaver. I wouldn’t be alive without it. I think Building Blocks should be available to the general public – take to Chugach View, library, etc. The whole community needs it.
· They do help me – needed for my survival
· I would like to (do) better than I am already doing. Get me involved in a group called Anger Management. When I don’t have solutions to problems, I need support.
· I’m in desperate need of SCC services. Am very depressed, panic attacks, sick every single day. Just lost my home of 9 years. Six friends died in 5 weeks. Son just had major back surgery & is not healing very well as hoped. Mood swings & crying jags daily. No one cares about me. My puppy does tho. I love her so much – Ashley – only reason I deep getting up every day cuz she needs me & I need her even more.
· I found my own job and have been working there for 6 years and 3 months
· Sometimes I need help to pay rent and go buy groceries
· I need some help with my phobias. I think I have phobia-based chemically induced Torrette’s Syndrome. And I have problems with sleeping.
· Some case managers should do better work on their remembering and forgetting. You tell them something and they forget.
· STES is not doing a good job of assisting me in an employment search
· The money I get from APA and SSI is not enough to live on and I feel I do not have the skills to earn a good living and I feel I will not be able to have enough skills ever and I do not know if I ever will.
· I don’t need them daily, once a week would be good.
Follow-up Questions: Consumer
Comments
1. Were any of the questions hard to understand? Which ones? Why?
Bristol Bay
· No (7)
· #2, don’t know what it is asking
· No comments
· Just on 1st page. I don’t know what ‘conservator’ means and what is asked by ‘payee’.
· No, I don’t know, they are all very easy. I like all the mental health staff – they are very open to us, whom they know us all.
· Yes
· Good
LifeQuest
· No (18)
· No, most were not hard
· Not really
· No comments (3)
· #28 – some have more than one issue and one day is different than the next.
· Not with help
· Yes, #9 Comment
·
Yes, 7 and 8
Norton Sound
· No (6)
· No comments
SCC
· No (47)
· N/A (3)
· None (2)
· No hard questions
· Yes (all), hard for me to concentrate & focus eyes.
· Pretty clear.
· Some services are monthly; others may be weekly – to lump them together makes it more difficult to answer.
· No comments
2. Were any of the questions unclear? Which ones? Why?
Bristol Bay
· Just #2
· Yes
·
No, they are easy to me. I don’t know how much to do better because they are the best.
· None
· No (7)
· No comments
·
LifeQuest
· Not really
· No (18)
· No, most were clear
· #7 and 8
· #5 – I’ve been here a long time
· No comments (3)
Norton Sound
· No (6)
· No comments
SCC
· All OK
· No (49)
· N/A
· None was unclear
· Yes, all of them
· What did ‘SCC’ stand for – unclear, had to ask
· Many of the participants continued to not know what ‘advocacy’ meant
· No comments (2)
3. Was the questionnaire too long?
Bristol Bay
· No (11)
· No, very short and to the point. Great!
· No comments (2)
LifeQuest
· Yes (2)
· Not really
· No. I realized I could answer a few or all through comment or not.
· No (17)
· No comments (4)
Norton Sound
· No (7)
· A little (Client answered only 1st 4 questions)
SCC
· None
· N/A
· No (51)
· No comments (2)
4. Did we ask everything that you think is important about mental health services?
Bristol Bay
· Yes (5)
· Everything’s good.
· Do I feel the therapy is helping? Yes.
· No (3)
· No comments (3)
LifeQuest
· Yes (11)
· Yes, you did, thank you
· Pretty much
· Social pressure & parental obedience
· (Response unreadable)
· No, #3
· No (6)
· No comments (2)
Norton Sound
· Yes (4)
SCC
· Yes (28)
· Yes, I am satisfied with the questions
· All except do I like the service I receive from SCC: Yes!
· No (9)
· Don’t know (2)
· No comments
· No. This place should be run like the main center – easier access to medications
· No, need more questions about mental health
· I can’t think of anything else. I think services should be offered to everybody who needs them.
· Maybe need more personal questions about client’s feelings.
· More questions about how a person feels they are improving. What stage am I at, areas of need (social, personal, etc.)?
· No, not what the elaboration should be
· No, could have asked a few more questions
· More questioning about activity groups would help
· How are the meds working?
· I guess so
· Just about
· Almost
· Possibly
· Most everything
· I doubt it
SCC (continued)
· I doubt that
· No comments (6)
· No (2)
5. Are there any questions that we should add?
Bristol Bay
· No (5)
· No comments (2)
· Yes, help who needs in health and hurt
· ?
· Nothing
· See above
LifeQuest
· No (12)
· No comments (3)
· Yes (2)
· Yes, like ‘Do you need more help’ and give a list of things they can help people with.
· Do you need other services like other medical, eyes, teeth, internal, etc.?
· You didn’t ask if we are happy with counselor or doctor and happy with programs.
· Maybe need a car
· How we feel about people and the world in general
· Need to learn more about love
· Not really
· Probably (2)
Norton Sound
· No (3)
SCC
· Yes (3)
· Yes, what made you decide to seek these services?
· N/A
· No (30)
· I don’t know (4)
· No comments (6)
· Probably
· I don’t know at this time.
· Not that I can think of
· Need time to think
· What is the normal sex life a man 59?
· Matching counselor to patient.
· How long have you been in the program or in the U.S.?
· Need more specific info on goals/progress in groups
· Yes, more questions about life in general and more space to write the answer
· Ask question about respect given to self and possible abuse. I have experienced abuse in Alaska.
· If the client likes the services
· If you don’t like your therapist, what are your options? I like mine.
· Can you choose providers? Probably so, not sure what they should be. Do you get along with case worker, psychiatrist, therapist?
· Does the system adequately help you completely control your mental illness?
· Why do I have to come here this long?
· Not sure
· No comments (2)
6. Do you have any other comments?
Bristol Bay
· No (7)
· No comments (3)
· What I especially like is that they have been providing me with checks every month, year after year and am glad for the medications.
· I’m happy with my services
· Thank you so much for your help!
LifeQuest
· Not really
· No (11)
· No comments (7)
· Case managers have too many people to work with.
· What is the reason for asking us all these questions?
· Is this a test of our competence?
· All the questions were easy to understand, and you asked important questions about mental health, and it was a perfect length.
· My counselor now has such a large caseload she cannot service each one of us to fit our needs. There is not enough hours in the day and someone keeps cutting funds more and more
and she keeps getting more and more clients. This is not fair. We all suffer for this.
· I’m a consumer and on the Mental Health Board in the past. It was wonderful to see new ideas and I was so disappointed to see the progress, many not all, but important ideas fall down because of lack of finances and/or politics (changing of the guard syndrome). There are cracks and we need to find and serve those who are lonely, and have little focus or energy to see out help, let alone change the system. I have major physical and mental concerns myself
now, and I worked so hard before that. I gave up the fight for a while. I’m tired
& burned down. But I would love to help and serve again. I sincerely believe the answer is teaching our teachers and social workers a new way while on their college journey. Then give them the support, both financial and mental, and extra help they may need. I’ve seen so many gifted workers receive flack for their efforts. Demands & orders so their hands were bound. I know you’ll get the jist. I’m sorry I haven’t taken the time to edit this. You have my permission to.
Norton Sound
· No (4)
· N/A
· No comments (1)
· Elaboration of some questions: #2 – If I had other options, I might to a different agency, but I want to keep my therapist. I would not want to start over with someone else. #5 – therapist willing to see me or talk to me as often as I felt was necessary, within the limits imposed on him due to agency travel requirements and what insurance allows. #7 – Since I also work 8-5, it is not easy to fit in an appointment within those same hours; however, my therapist was willing to see me over my lunch hour, until my position changed so I can make appointments within the 8-5 schedule. #10 – Even though my therapist believes that I can grow, change and recover, it seems that he is content with status quo. #13 – I did not receive a copy of my rights for about 2 years. #17 – My therapist comes up with my treatment plan; however, he presents it to me, for my approval, before it is signed, etc. so I can amend the plan. #18 – My therapist could be more sensitive to my religious background. #19 – I do not feel that I am in control of managing my illness.
Norton Sound (continued)
· Stupid questions
· Forced to do this
SCC
· None (2)
· N/A
· The survey was very easy.
· No (23)
· No comment (17)
· Very simple
· Yes, I like the services at SCC and my caseworker.
· It was good questions.
· No, other than I’m very thankful for SCC.
· Not that I can think of right now.
· Not enough groups. I would like to have the Diabetic Gp resume.
· Staff got to be aware of patient – understand patient desires. Some staff are self-centered.
· Why have so many groups been discontinued?
· I would like to take another driving test in my own car and with another evaluator.
· Activity groups help with symptom’s management.
· I think SCC services are excellent
· The mental health system should be checked out like the military.
· Yes, the questionnaire is very helpful to me
· The services at SCC are great. It’s for everybody.
· Would like to have info about who to make pertinent comments to that affect my treatment
· I find the staff at SCC to be very supportive. I have not bee hospitalized for over 4 years.
APPENDIX THREE
Qualitative
Comments:
Demographic
Questionnaire (Child & Family Services)
Question 11. Comments.
Is there anything else that you would like to tell us about yourself or
the services you receive (or received) that might help us to better serve you?
Alternatives
· No comments (6)
LifeQuest
· (Client name) misses her friends she met a Buckeye. She asked that her phone # be given to her friends, but she is not sure this happened.
· I think that is important to address both sides of the situation. We have had good success working with our boys, but sometimes as parents we weren’t sure if we were making the right decisions.
· I feel all services provided so far are a success. Going to Phoenix House made him realize we will not accept his bad behavior anymore. After giving him so many chances, to not be successful in our discipline, but will be a success with our consistency!
· The services delivered are much enhanced by the close communication with private therapist. They are working in concert and therefore much more effective for client!
· During school months, evening counseling appointments.
· The counselor my child saw I felt didn’t work much on anger issues. So I stopped taking him to counseling. But he is doing much better with the other programs.
· I have much to say.
· No
· No comments (7)
Follow-up Questions - Consumer Comments
1. Were any of the questions hard to understand? Which ones?
Why?
Alternatives
· No (3)
· No comments (3)
· Yes because I don’t know what you’re talking about.
Norton Sound
· Yes
·
LifeQuest
· No (8)
· No…not when I read it right!
2. Were any of the questions unclear? Which ones? Why?
Alternatives
· No (3)
LifeQuest
· No (10)
· No comments (5)
3. Was the questionnaire too long?
Alternatives Norton Sound
· No (3) · Yes
LifeQuest
· No (11)
· Yes
· No comments (3)
4. Did we ask everything that you think is important about mental
health services?
Alternatives
· Yes (2)
· Concerning my child, Yes
LifeQuest
· Family constellation
· ? (2)
· Too new as a Foster Mom to know!
· Yes (8)
· No comments (3)
5. Are there any questions that we should add?
Alternatives
· None at this time
· No (2)
LifeQuest
· No (9)
· No comments (3)
· Don’t know (2)
6. Do you have any other comments?
(Please use the reverse side if needed.)
Alternatives
· None
· No (2)
LifeQuest
· No (5)
· No comments (7)
· Without this help I don’t know what would have happened to my grandchild. He certainly wouldn’t be doing as well as he is.
· #10 – would be nice to have 5 days/week.
· I feel therapy one-on-one is good, but being involved with others in a group setting exposes children to learn more negative behaviors besides their own issues.
APPENDIX FOUR
Qualitative
Comments:
MHSIP
(Adult)
1. Were any of the questions hard to understand? Which ones?
Why?
Bristol Bay
· Alright
· Yes, almost all
· No (6)
· No comments (3)
LifeQuest
·
Not really
· No (17)
· No comments (2)
· #3, 7, 8 - did not understand them
· #28 – Some have more than one issue and one day is different than the next.
Norton Sound
· No (7)
SCC
· No (43)
· N/A
· Some – because English is not my primary language
· A little bit – attention span is short
· Yes, ‘cause they were hard to understand some
of the questions
· Yes, #14, 17, 19
· The question about ethnic culture was hard to understand (rest of comment unreadable).
· Yes, the ones about direct result of services.
· Yes, #17
· #17 – difficult to know if you want the end results or the actual therapy/participation.
· Mostly pretty easy
· Yes, many of them because I wasn’t sure of question because it’s hard to think and judge the answer should be or could be.
· No comments (2)
2. Were any of the questions unclear? Which ones? Why?
Bristol Bay
·
All okay
·
#2 – rights as a patient? Rights as a citizen
(laws)? Rights as a human being?
· No (6)
· No comments (4)
LifeQuest
· No (18)
· No comments (2)
· Wording confusing at times
· #3, 7, 8 – did not understand them
· Yes
Norton Sound
· No (7)
SCC
· No (42)
· None
· N/A
· Somewhat
· Yes, #14, 17, 19
· Yes, #17 (2)
· See above (re: #17)
· Yes, 21-28 – I don’t understand it
· #17 – both therapist & I decided TX goals
SCC (continued)
· #21 – having a hard time keeping self together, ‘stuck’
· #22, 23, 25, 28
· Yes – as above (English not primary language)
· Yes, because I did not know if it applied to me or not and I was confused. The
· answers were either too specific or not enough.
· ‘Somewhere’ concerning the people around my household
· No comments (3)
3. Was the questionnaire too long?
Bristol Bay
· Yes
·
No (5)
· No, just right
· No comments (5)
LifeQuest
·
Yes (2)
·
Not really
· No (17)
· No, though I realized I could answer a few or
all though comment or not
· No comments (3)
Norton Sound
· No (7)
· A little
SCC
· N/A
· No (47)
· No comments (3)
· Yes
· A little
4. Did we ask everything that you think is important about mental
health services?
Bristol Bay
· Yes (5)
· No
· None
· No comments (4)
LifeQuest
·
Yes (12)
·
One-on-one therapy would be nice.
·
I’m not sure of everything.
·
Possibly (2)
· No (5)
· No comments (4)
Norton Sound
· Yes (5)
· No, you left out office support (secretarial & billing) questions/comments.
· No comments
SCC
· Yes (36)
· ?
· No (5)
· I believe so
· Not sure
· Most everything
· Don’t know
· I don’t think its possible to ask everything that’s important.
SCC (continued)
· Maybe you need more detailed info about clients’ feelings
· Yes, but more questions about groups would be helpful
· My self state of being
· I think so.
· I guess.
· No comments (5)
5. Are there any questions that we should add?
Bristol Bay
· No (4)
· None
· No comments (5)
LifeQuest
·
Can’t think of any
· No (13)
·
No comments (4)
·
Yes (How are we today?)
·
What is mental illness?
·
People should be close.
·
Yes. The case
managers are overworked and there is not enough home-based therapy even for
disabled parents.
·
What programs or areas of your life would you like more
help in: such as, social activities, sports geared to different levels of
ability and/or comprehension, group settings other than what has been already
set up, life skills geared to adapt to disabilities and levels of ability, arts
& crafts classes, social singing groups, more areas to build self-esteem.
·
Probably
Norton Sound
· No (4)
· Not sure
· Yes – how long do you anticipate using these services? A good question to ask is about family support in efforts to improve mental health.
· No comments
SCC
· No (30)
· None
· Don’t know (2)
· N/A
· ? (2)
· ? Yes
· Yes
· Yes, about group activities
· Yes, because it has to deal with past and relative present time.
· About attaining a plateau of self-growth
· Need to think on it – need to see my therapist more often. Am too weepy, daily crying, lots of pain
· Do you feel more informed about mental illness – does that help?
· Employment – how do you know if I am recovered enough to seek employment?
· Yes, more questions on life in general
· Ask about respect & abuse
· How to contact staff quick enough instead of having things drawn out
· More specific about mental health
· Probably
· Don’t know
· Not sure
· Not that I can think of (2)
· How happy are you with your medications?
· No comments (6)
6. Do you have any other comments?
Bristol Bay
· I very much feel better after the psychiatrist increased my dose of Prolixin. I guess they know how to treat the mentally ill.
· Keep up the great work!!! Everyone of you!
· No (2)
· No comments (8)
LifeQuest
· No (9)
· No comments (3)
· Only two sessions – still wet behind the ears.
· Case management questions. Lack of support system with agency. Therapy sessions – lack of; need badly. Information given to all clients.
·
These questions were very helpful to me.
·
No, I think you covered it well.
·
I don’t like the $50 no-show fee and the billing
techniques that are used.
·
Seems a waste of time.
·
I’m disabled and I can’t get to my case manager’s
office.
·
It sure took a long time to hear back on loan.
· #9 – never used this service because I was terribly verbally abused on 1 psychiatrist and I have heard others say his voice is monotone and he seems to have little empathy. I’m scared and untrusting to use this service if he is on board (name). Also, I sense a big change to the good is happening since (name) is gone. The program needs to be consumer-driven and the consumer needs to feel they are an important part of the team. Even if you have mental illness, you need to feel others respect you and your ideas are being given worth. This may be a fine line, a new way of thinking that can and will threaten many old line professionals
who think since they went on to get their doctorate they are the professionals, they have the solutions and treatment and damn to those who threaten their Holy Ground of Wisdom! This questionnaire is a good tool if your ears and hearts are open and compassionate. Give this out frequently and invite a consumer or two to join in on the decision-making.
·
#17 – needs improvement
Norton Sound
· No (2)
· It was difficult for me to fill out the survey because I have not received services from BHS before. (Client marked all answers N/A)
· No comments (2)
· Keep up the good work!!
· It would be good to have separate questions about staff and clinicians/therapists. I have no problems with my therapist or my psychiatrist; however, some of the other staff, i.e., billing personnel and the billing situation, is very bad and detrimental to my recover. In fact, the billing situation has caused me major problems requiring more therapy to deal with that situation. So I can give ‘staff’ one score, but a different score for my therapist. Also, there is no or very little consistency with office staff, i.e., receptionist. There have been many people in that position for short time periods. I never know who will be there. In connection with the inconsistency of office staff, I feel that many of the people that ‘fill in’ for a week or two, or month at a time, these people tend to be just anyone that director or Human Resources doesn’t know where else to place the person. ‘We have this person we don’t know where to place – oh, we could put her in
Norton Sound (continued)
BHS while we figure out what to do with her.’ I am fairly uncomfortable with that attitude.
· On Question #9, the psychiatrist travels to many communities in our region and was not always able to schedule appointments when it was convenient for me, but I was always given an appointment time within an acceptable time frame. On Question #17, to me it has been very important to know that treatment goals are discussed and set together with staff.
SCC
· No (27)
· N/A (2)
· No – ‘Thank You.’
· No. Will I get the outcome of this survey? I want to know if this survey helps in funding.
· Thank you
· Thanks for asking!
· It was a good questionnaire survey because it made me think of (how) far I have gone in life and I (have) much further I can go
· Very easy
· See which medicine is working for me and which is not
· I would like to see my psychiatrist more often.
· #5 – appointments are hard to schedule in a timely manner. #8 – must attend some groups
that don’t seem to be significant to my therapy sessions. #12 – difficult to complain to some therapists. #13 – didn’t know that I didn’t have to go to Building Blocks Group.
· #17 – We decided together – then I strongly agree.
· My counselor gave me reading material and we discussed ideas generated from this, which gave me a lot of insight.
· Yes, a good question would be to make the answer to question be relative to the past and how well the present has become.
· I need to practice social skills.
· I don’t like the Zyprexa because it causes me to gain weight.
· I would like to see another diabetic education/support group at SCC.
· Accepting treatment for my mental illness changed my life a lot, but I guess it’s been worth it. I am happy and feel good.
· The survey was clear, concise and easy to understand
· I want to be more involved in my treatment plan
· The SCC staff makes it nice for people on a weekly, daily basis. They are really, really nice.
· #4 – hard for bus riders. Would be helpful to have a map with several ways to get to SCC. Have a bus schedule available. Let out a little early for bus riders. Nice to know about all the services SCC has to offer – would like an education group on depression.
· No comments (11)
APPENDIX
FIVE
Qualitative
Comments:
MHSIP
(YSS-F) (Child)
22. What
has been the most helpful thing about the services you and your child received
over the last 6 months?
· No responses
23. What
would improve services here?
· No responses
1. Were any of the questions hard to understand? Which ones?
Why?
Alternatives
· No (3)
LifeQuest
· No (8)
· No comments
2. Were any of the questions unclear? Which ones? Why?
Alternatives
· No (3)
LifeQuest
· No (8)
· No comments
3.
Was the questionnaire too long?
Alternatives
· No (3)
LifeQuest
· No (8)
· No comments
4. Did we ask everything that you think is important about mental
health services?
Alternatives
· Yes (2)
· Concerning my child, Yes
LifeQuest
· Yes (7)
· No comments (2)
5. Are there any questions that we should add?
Alternatives
· No (2)
· None at this time
LifeQuest
· No (5)
· No comments (2)
· What kind of services do you feel were lacking?
6. Do you have any other comments?
Alternatives
· No (2)
· I have tried to get partial services for other children in my care and, because other services are managed by another agency, we have been denied. If the client is eligible and also Medicaid-eligible, I have concern w/Alternatives’ policies. It is my opinion that this agency does discriminate and has internal problems. Records will reflect a high turnover in manpower, and I for one have been treated disparately and actually singled out for being persistent in my endeavors. I feel the mental health agencies (personnel) should not have personal vendettas. The client’s need and services should be #1 in all cases.
LifeQuest
· No (3)
· No comments (4)
· I would have to say that consistency works both ways. Having our son in Phoenix House was good, but on our paperwork we were under the impression that kids were to be monitored. Being in a co-ed setting children should be separated with their own gender. Our son expressed that he witnessed two teens making out during movie time. Where was the staff? It states in our paperwork that these behaviors are prohibited. I know it’s hard to be watching kids at all times, but these places are recommended full attention and full supervision. How come they were not being supervised and able to do these things? As our 11 year old sat and watched these two go at a behavior prohibited? Please bring this to Phoenix House staff’s attention, so nothing else happens again. Are an unexpected pregnancy – in the big picture as a precaution! Thanks.
· Have questioned billing practices to Medicaid in past. Will watch closely this time.
· #7 – have just begun, probably a better question to ask much later. #13 – not appropriate. #18 & 19 – are getting
APPENDIX SIX
Qualitative
Comments:
MHSIP
(Youth)
Question 22. What has been the most helpful thing about
the service you received over the last 6 months?
Norton Sound
· Someone to talk to
Question 23. What would improve services here?
Norton Sound
· More time
1. Were any of the questions hard to understand? Which ones?
Why?
LifeQuest
· No (2)
· Yes because it was just circling numbers.
· No comments (3)
2. Were any of the questions unclear? Which ones? Why?
LifeQuest
· No (2)
· No comments (3)
3. Was the questionnaire too long?
LifeQuest
· No (3)
· No comments
4. Did we ask everything that you think is important about mental
health services?
LifeQuest
· Yes (3)
· No comments (3)
5. Are there any questions that we should add?
LifeQuest
· No (2)
· No comments (4)
6. Do you have any other comments?
LifeQuest
· No (3)
· #20 – we did it together
· #24 – client marked 2 & wrote ‘1 person’ and marked 4 & wrote ‘all others’
· No comments (2)
APPENDIX SEVEN
<Agency>
Client Assessment Worksheet
Program Name
Client Number Date
1. During the last few (2-3) months, how often have you engaged in productive activity? Productive activities include subsistence activities, full or part time employment, volunteer work, church activities, school, sports, or social activity.
c 1 Usually every day
c 2 2 – 5 days a week
c 3 5 – 10 days a month
c 4 1 – 4 days a month
c 5 Not active
2. Which of the following best describes your legal status during the last few (2-3) months?
c 1 No legal involvement at all
c 2 Some non-criminal problems but no
threat of jail such as truancy or minor litigation
c 3 Legal issues that are now pending
c 4 Probation, parole, awaiting sentencing
or extreme impact, non-criminal problems such as divorce or child custody or
attending court-ordered outpatient mental health treatment
c 5 Incarcerated:
Lock-up or non-lock-up or mandatory hospitalization
3. During the last few (2-3) months, how would you best describe your
feeling of general safety? General
safety refers to issues such as domestic violence, homelessness, safety of community or
village, reliable transportation, prejudice, or parental discord.
c 1 I feel safe all of the time
c 2 I
feel safe most of the time
c 3 I
feel safe sometimes but feel unsafe other times
c 4 I
feel unsafe most of the time
c 5 I
feel unsafe all of the time
4. During the past few (2-3) months, how would you describe your
economic security?
c 1 Very secure economically
c 2 I
am more often than not economically secure, very few concerns
c 3 Somewhat
secure economically, my problems are tolerable
c 4 I
am more often than not economically insecure; I have many economic concerns.
c 5 Extreme
economic hardship; unable to meet basic life needs.
5. During the last few (2-3) months, how would
you describe your housing status?
c 1 Independent
Living. Most of the time, I owned
or rented my own habitable house or apartment; or I chose to live with others.
c 2 Lives
with others. Most of the time, I
lived with family or others in a custodial relationship where they helped care
for me.
c 3 Sheltered
care. Most of the time, I lived in
a supervised SRO, adult foster home, supported apartment program; or Residential.
I lived in a residential program such as a domiciliary, group home, staffed
apartment, or halfway house with 24 hour per day, seven days a week
supervision.
c 4
Homeless. Most of the time, I was homeless, lived in a
shelter or barely
habitable,
inadequate place.
c 5
Institutional. Most of the time, I lived in a hospital or
institution most of
the time.
6. Dual diagnosis (substance abuse) is a common
problem that often goes along with being mentally ill. We are not here to judge you but to get
information that will help improve your treatment. Please answer the following questions:
a. Have friends or relatives asked you to Cut down on alcohol, tobacco, or other drugs, or quit entirely?
c Yes c No
b. Are you Annoyed by friends or relatives who question your use?
c Yes c No
c. Have you experienced Guilt because of your drinking or use?
c Yes c No
d. Do you need an Eye opener in the morning (alcohol, tobacco, or other drugs)
to get started?
c Yes c No
To how many of the above questions you answer “Yes”
c 1 I
answered “Yes” to none of the questions
c 2 I
answered “Yes” to only one of the questions
c 3 I
answered “Yes” to two of the questions
c 4 I
answered “Yes” to three of the questions
c 5 I
answered “Yes” to all four questions
7. During the last six months,
how many times have you been hospitalized for mental health treatment?
c 1 None
c 2 1
time
c 3 2
times
c 4 3
times
c 5 4
or more times
8a. Which of the following best describes how you get your regular medical care? Regular health care is defined as health care received from your primary or family physician in a physician’s office or clinic.
c 1 I have access to regular health care
all of the time.
c 5 I
do not have access to regular health care.
I use the emergency room or emergency medical technicians for all of my
health care.
8b.During the last few (2-3) months, how often have physical medical problems interfered with your normal activities?
c 1 Never
c 2 Only a few times in the last six months
c 3 At least once a month
c 4 At least once a week
c 5 Usually every day
9. Which of the following best
describes how your health care is paid for?
c 1 I
do not have to pay for any of my health care.
I am either fully insured (including Medicaid) or receive my health care
through an Indian Health Service facility with no charges.
c 2 I
have health care insurance (including Medicaid or Medicare) or receive service
at an Indian Health Service facility but have to pay for some of the charges
myself.
c 3 I
have some health care insurance but I have to pay about half of the charges for
my health care.
c 4 I
have very little health care insurance and I have to pay for most of the costs
for my health care.
c 5 I
have to pay all of the costs for my health care out of pocket.
Read to
consumer:
This is the first time we have used this survey so we would like your
opinion about it.
Consumers:
Were any of the questions hard to answer? Which ones? Why?
Were any of the questions unclear? Which ones? Why?
Do you have any other comments? (use reverse side if needed)
Clinicians:
(also
please feel free to write any comments about individual questions right next to
the questions)
Did consumers have problems with any of the questions? Which questions? What problems?
Were any of the questions unclear? If Yes, please tell us which questions were unclear.
Were there things we did not ask that you feel we should add?
Do you have any other comments?
APPENDIX
EIGHT
<AGENCY>
CLIENT
STATUS REVIEW (CSR)
Client Number Date __________________
Program Current GAF __________
1. How often are you currently involved in
activities that are important to you? (Such activities might include subsistence
activities (hunting, fishing, berry picking, etc.), full or part time
employment, volunteer work, church activities, school, sports, or social
activity)
c 1 Usually
every day
c 2 2
– 5 days a week
c 3 5-10
days a month
c 4 1-4
days a month
c 5 Not
active
2. How often do physical health problems
currently keep you from doing your normal activities?
c 1 Never
c 2 Occasionally
c 3 Often
c 4 Regularly
c 5 Always
3. How often can you currently
get the physical health care that you need?
(Physical health care excludes dental and eye care, and is defined as care received
from your regular, local, or visiting health care provider.)
c 1 All of
the time
c 2 Most of the time
c 3 Sometimes (occasionally use emergency services)
c 4 Limited (use emergency services most of the time)
c 5 Almost
Never (use emergency services all
of the time)
4. How is your health care paid
for?
c 1 Fully insured or use an Indian
Health Service facility (I personally do not have to pay for health care
costs.)
c 2 Well-insured (I personally have to pay only for some of
health care costs.)
c 3 Some insurance (I personally have to pay about half of the
cost.)
c 4 Very little insurance (I personally have to pay most of the cost.)
c 5 No insurance (I personally have to pay all of the cost or
am unable to pay.)
5. During the last 6 months, how many times
have you been hospitalized for mental health treatment? (Indicate
length of stay for each hospitalization, if available)
c 1 None
c 2 1 time _____________________________________________
c 3 2 times _____________________________________________
c 4 3 times _____________________________________________
c 5 4 or more times __________________________________________
6. Please answer the following
questions about your current drug and/or alcohol use.
a.
Have friends or relatives asked you to Cut down on alcohol or
other drugs or to quit
entirely? c Yes c No
b.
Are you Annoyed by friends or relatives who question
your use? c Yes c No
c.
Have you experienced Guilt because of your drinking or use? c Yes c No
d.
Do you need an Eye opener in the morning (alcohol or
other drugs) to get started? c Yes c No
c
1 ‘Never Used’ or answered ‘Yes’ to none of the questions
c
2 Answered ‘Yes’ to one of the questions
c
3 Answered ‘Yes’ to two of the questions
c
4 Answered ‘Yes’ to three of the questions
c
5 Answered ‘Yes’ to four of the
questions
7. Which of the following best
describes your current financial situation?
c 1 Very
secure financially (enough income to pay for basic needs, such as food,
housing, clothing)
c 2 Financially
secure most of the time (very few financial concerns)
c 3 Somewhat financially secure (financial
problems are tolerable)
c 4 Many financial problems (not
enough income to pay for some basic needs)
c 5 Extreme financial hardship (not
enough income to pay for most basic needs)
8. Which of the following
categories best describes your current housing situation?
c 1 Independent
(own or rent safe dwelling,
or I chose to live with others)
c 2 Live with others (family
or others who help care for me)
c 3 Residential facility (domiciliary,
group home, half-way house with 24-hour staff supervision) or Sheltered care (supervised
SRO, adult foster home, assisted living facility)
c 4 Homeless (shelter,
on the street, vehicle, unsafe or abandoned dwelling, temporary housing, such
as hotel or staying with family/friends)
c 5 Institution
(hospital, prison)
9.
How would you best describe your current feeling of general
safety? (General safety refers to issues such as domestic violence,
homelessness, safety of community or village, prejudice, or parental discord.)
c 1 I
feel safe all of the time.
c 2 I
feel safe most of the time.
c 3 I
feel safe sometimes, but feel unsafe other times.
c 4 I
feel unsafe most of the time.
c 5 I
feel unsafe all of the time
10. Which of the following categories best
describes your current involvement with police, court, or jail?
c 1 None (No
legal involvement at all)
c 2 Limited (Some
non-criminal problems, such as truancy, minor litigation, mutually agreeable
divorce or custody issues, court-ordered outpatient mental health treatment,
but no threat of jail)
c 3 Moderate (Legal
issues now pending)
c 4 Significant (Probation,
parole, felony charges pending, awaiting sentencing or extreme impact, contested divorce, contested
custody issues)
c 5 Extreme (lock-up
or non-lock-up facility, mandatory hospitalization)
Sum of ratings for all 10 questions: ________
APPENDIX NINE
<Agency>
Mental
Health Consumer Satisfaction Survey (Adult)
Attached to this cover sheet is a consumer survey developed by the Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program (MHSIP). We have added this cover sheet with demographic questions to help us better understand the diverse people that we are serving in Alaska and the impact that services have on our diverse population. Please note that there is no place that asks for your name or any other identifying information. Neither have we placed any codes on the forms or envelopes that would enable someone to identify you. This is a completely anonymous survey. |
1. Which of these groups includes your age on your last birthday?
c Less than 18 years old c 18 – 22 years old
c 23 – 59 years old c 60 or older
2. Which of the following best describes the race/ethnicity that you consider yourself?
c African American c Alaska Native/American Indian
c Asian/Pacific Islander c Caucasian
c Hispanic/Latino c Other
3. Gender
c Female c Male
4a. Which of the following services have you received in the last year from <agency> (please check all that apply)?
c Therapy/Counseling c Case Management
c Housing Services c Assistance with Employment Issues
c Family Services c Substance Abuse Treatment Services
c Transportation Services c Advocacy Services
c Psychiatric Services/Medication Management
c Other Services (please specify)
4b. Are you still receiving services from <agency>?
c Yes c No
5. How long have you been receiving, or did you receive, services from <agency>?
c Less than six months c 6 months to 2 years
c 2 to 5 years c More than 5 years
6. About how often do (or did) you receive
direct services from <agency>?
c Daily c Weekly
c Bi-weekly c Monthly
c Every three months c Other
7. Comments. Is there anything else that you would like to tell us about yourself or the services that receive that might help us to better serve you?
Thank you for
taking the time to answer these questions about yourself.
APPENDIX TEN
<Agency>
DEMOGRAPHIC QUESTIONNAIRE (Adult Services)
This
questionnaire is part of the attached Consumer
Satisfaction Survey. These
questions will help us better understand the consumers who use mental health
services and how those services affect our different population. There is no place that asks for your name
or any other information that could identify you. There are no codes on the forms or envelopes. This is a completely anonymous survey. |
Date __________________
1. How old are
you? __________________
2. Do you have a
guardian, conservator or payee? c Yes c No
If yes, please indicate which
one:
___________________________________________
3. Which of the following best describes the race or ethnic group that you consider yourself?
c African American c Alaska
Native/American Indian
c
Asian/Pacific Islander c Caucasian
c Hispanic/Latino c Other
4. Gender: c Female c Male
5. Which of the following services have you received in the last year from <agency>? (Please check all that apply.)
c Therapy/Counseling c
Case Management
c Housing c Employment
c
Family Services c
Substance Abuse Treatment
c Transportation Services c
Advocacy Services
c Psychiatric Services/Medication c Other
______________________
6. Are you still receiving services from <agency>? c Yes c No
7.
How long have you been receiving, or did you
receive, services from <agency>?
c
Less than six months c 2
to 5 years
c 6 months to 2 years c More than
5 years
8. About how often do (or did) you receive services from
<agency>?
c Daily c Twice a month
c Once
a week c Every other month
c Twice a week c
Every three months
c Once a month c Other ______________________
9.
Comments. Is there anything else
that you would like to tell us about yourself or the services that you receive
that might help us to better serve you? (Please use the reverse
side if needed.)
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.
APPENDIX ELEVEN
DEMOGRAPHIC QUESTIONNAIRE (Child & Family Services)
This questionnaire is part of the attached Consumer Satisfaction Survey. Your answers will help us better
understand the consumers who use mental health services and how those
services affect our different population. There is no place that asks for
your name or any other information that could identify you. There are no codes on the forms or
envelopes. This is a completely anonymous survey. |
Date ________________________
Completed by:
c Biological Parent c Foster
Parent c
Guardian
c Self c Other __________________
1. How old are you (or the child receiving services)? ________________
2. Which of the following best describes the race/ethnicity that you consider yourself (or the child receiving services)?
c African American c Alaska Native/American Indian
c Asian/Pacific Islander c Caucasian
c Hispanic/Latino c Other
3. Gender: c Female c Male
4.
What is your school
situation (or that of the child receiving services)?
c Grade ______ c
Not in school c Working on GED c Other _______
5. Are you (or the child receiving services) in protective custody? c Yes c No
If yes, please select one of the following and
indicate for how long?
___________________
c Division of Family and Youth Services (DFYS)
c Division of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
c Parent-Guardian
c Other ________________________
6. Who referred you (or the child receiving services) to <agency> for mental health services?
c Self-referred c
DFYS c
School
c Parent/Guardian c DJJ c Other ________________
7.
Which of the
following services have you (or the child receiving services) received in the
last year from <agency>? (Please
check all that apply.)
c Therapy/Counseling c Employment
c Housing c Substance Abuse Treatment
c Family
Services c Advocacy
Service
c Transportation
Services c Treatment Foster Care
c Psychiatric
Services/Medications c Other
_______________________
c
Case
Management
8. Are you (or the child receiving services) still receiving services from <agency>?
c Yes c No
9. How long have you (or the child receiving services) been receiving, or did you receive services from <agency>?
c Less than six months c 2 to 5 years
c 6 months to 2 years c More than 5 years
10.
About how often do (or did) you (or the child receiving
services) receive services from <agency>?
c Daily c Twice a week c Twice a month c Every three months
c Once
a week c Once a month
c Every
other month c Other ___________
11.
Comments. Is there anything else
that you would like to tell us about yourself (or the child receiving
services), or the services that you receive that might help us to better serve
you? (Please use the reverse side if needed.)
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Thank you for taking the time to
answer these questions.
APPENDIX TWELVE |
||||||
<Agency> MHSIP CONSUMER SURVEY |
||||||
In order to
provide the best possible mental health services, we need to know what you
think about the services you received, the people who provided it, and the
results. There is space at the end of the survey to comment on any of your
answers. |
||||||
Please indicate your agreement or disagreement with each of the
following statements by circling the number that best represents your
opinion. If the question is about
something you have not experienced, circle N/A, to indicate that this item is
“not applicable” to you. |
Strongly
Agree =1 |
Agree =2 |
I am
Neutral =3 |
Disagree =4 |
Strongly
Disagree =5 |
Not
Applicable =N/A |
|
||||||
1.
I like the services that I receive here. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
2.
If I had other options, I would still get services
from this agency. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
3.
I would recommend this agency to a friend or
family member. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
4.
The location of the services was convenient
(parking, public transportation, distance, etc.). |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
5.
Staff were willing to see me as often as I felt it
was necessary. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
6.
Staff returned my calls within 24 hours. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
7.
Services were available at times that were good
for me. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
8.
I was able to get all the services I thought I
needed. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
9.
I was able to see a psychiatrist when I wanted to. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
10.
Staff here believe that I can grow, change, and
recover. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
11.
I felt comfortable asking questions about my
treatment and medication. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
12.
I felt free to complain. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
13.
I was given information about my rights. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
14.
Staff encouraged me to take responsibility for how
I live my life. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
15.
Staff told me what side effects to watch out for. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
16.
Staff respected my wishes about who is, and who is
not, to be given information about my treatment. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
17.
I, not staff, decided my treatment goals. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
18.
Staff were sensitive to my cultural/ethnic
background (race, religion, language, etc.). |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
19.
Staff helped me obtain the information I needed so
I could take charge of managing my illness |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
20.
I was encouraged to use consumer-run programs
(support groups, drop-in centers, crisis phone line, etc.). |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
Please indicate your agreement or disagreement with each of the
following statements by circling the number that best represents your
opinion. If the question is about
something you have not experienced, circle N/A, to indicate that this item is
“not applicable” to you. |
Strongly
Agree =1 |
Agree =2 |
I am
Neutral =3 |
Disagree =4 |
Strongly
Disagree =5 |
Not
Applicable =N/A |
As a direct result of the
services I received here: |
||||||
21.
I deal more effectively with daily problems. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
22.
I am better able to control my life. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
23.
I am better able to deal with crisis. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
24.
I am getting along better with my family. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
25.
I do better in social situations. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
26.
I do better in school and/or work. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
27.
My housing situation has improved. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
28.
My symptoms are not bothering me as much. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
29.
I experienced no harmful medication side effects. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
30.
I can deal better with people and situations that
used to be a problem for me. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
APPENDIX THIRTEEN
Youth services
survey (yss) |
|||||||||
To
improve services to clients, we need to know what you think about the
treatment you received, the
people who provided it, and the results of this treatment. |
|||||||||
Please indicate your agreement or
disagreement with each of the following statements by circling the number
that best represents your opinion. If
the question is about something you have not experienced, circle N/A, to
indicate that this item is “not applicable” to you. |
Strongly Agree =1 |
Agree =2 |
I
am Neutral =3 |
Disagree =4 |
Strongly Disagree =5 |
Not Applicable =N/A |
|||
|
|||||||||
1.
Overall, I
am satisfied with the services I received. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
|||
As a result of the services I
received: |
|||||||||
2.
I am better at handling daily life. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
|||
3.
I get along better with family members. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
|||
4.
I get along better with friends and other people. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
|||
5.
I am doing better in school and/or work. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
|||
6.
I am better able to cope when things go wrong. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
|||
7.
I am satisfied with my family life right now. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
|||
Feedback about the services I
received: |
|||||||||
8.
I helped to choose my services. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
|||
9.
I helped to choose my treatment goals. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
|||
10.
The people helping me stuck with me no matter
what. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
|||
11.
I felt I had someone to talk to when I was
troubled. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
|||
12.
The people helping me listened to what I had to
say. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
|||
13.
I was actively involved in my own treatment. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
|||
14.
I received services that were right for me. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
|||
15.
The location of services was convenient. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
|||
16.
Services were available at times that were
convenient for me. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
|||
17.
If I need services in the future, I would use
these services again. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
|||
18.
I got the help I wanted. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
|||
19.
I got as much help as I needed. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
|||
20. I, not
staff, determined my treatment goals. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
|||
Please indicate your agreement or
disagreement with each of the following statements by circling the number
that best represents your opinion. If
the question is about something you have not experienced, circle N/A, to
indicate that this item is “not applicable” to you. |
Strongly
Agree =1 |
Agree =2 |
I
am Neutral =3 |
Disagree =4 |
Strongly
Disagree =5 |
Not
Applicable =N/A |
|
||||||
21.
Staff treated me with respect. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
22. Staff
understood my family’s cultural traditions. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
23.
Staff respected my family’s religious/spiritual
beliefs. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
24.
Staff spoke with me in a way that I understood. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
25.
Staff were sensitive to my cultural/ethnic
background. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
26.
I felt discriminated against while trying to get
services here. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
APPENDIX FOURTEEN
Youth services
survey FOR FAMILIES (yss – f) |
||||||||
To
improve services to clients, we need to know what you think about the
treatment you received, the
people who provided it, and the results of this treatment. |
||||||||
Please indicate your agreement or
disagreement with each of the following statements by circling the number
that best represents your opinion. If
the question is about something you have not experienced, circle N/A, to
indicate that this item is “not applicable” to you. |
Strongly Agree =1 |
Agree =2 |
I am Neutral =3 |
Disagree =4 |
Strongly Disagree =5 |
Not Applicable =N/A |
||
|
||||||||
1.
Overall, I am satisfied with the services my child
received. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
||
As a result of the services my child
and/or family received: |
||||||||
2.
My child is better at handling daily life. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
||
3.
My child gets along better with family members. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
||
4.
My child gets along better with friends and other
people. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
||
5.
My child is doing better in school and/or work. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
||
6.
My child is better able to cope when things go
wrong. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
||
7.
I am satisfied with our family life right now. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
||
Feedback about the services my child
and/or family received: |
||||||||
8.
I helped to choose my child’s services. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
||
9.
I helped to choose my child’s treatment goals. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
||
10.
The people helping my child stuck with us no
matter what. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
||
11.
I felt my child had someone to talk to when he/she
was troubled. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
||
12.
The people helping my child listened to what
he/she had to say. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
||
13.
I was frequently involved in my child’s treatment. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
||
14.
The services my child and/or family received were
right for us. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
||
15.
The location of services was convenient for us. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
||
16.
Services were available at times that were convenient
for us. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
||
17.
If I need services for my child in the future, I
would use these services again. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
||
18.
My family got the help we wanted for my child. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
||
19.
My family got as much help as we needed for my
child. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
||
20.
My child and family’s needs determined my
child’s treatment goals. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
||
Please indicate your agreement or
disagreement with each of the following statements by circling the number
that best represents your opinion. If
the question is about something you have not experienced, circle N/A, to
indicate that this item is “not applicable” to you. |
Strongly
Agree =1 |
Agree =2 |
I
am Neutral =3 |
Disagree =4 |
Strongly
Disagree =5 |
Not
Applicable =N/A |
|
||||||
21.
Staff treated me with respect. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
22.
Staff understood my family’s cultural traditions. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
23.
Staff respected my family’s religious/spiritual
beliefs. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
24.
Staff spoke with me in a way that I understood. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
25.
Staff were sensitive to my cultural/ethnic
background. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |
26.
I felt we were discriminated against while trying
to get services here. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
N/A |